“…The methods used to measure vascular endothelial function and physical fragility were inconsistent across the included studies, with some studies using multiple measures. Of the 29 studies included in the review, carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT; n = 7 [22,26,28,33,[36][37][38]), the ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI; n = 4 [22,36,37,45]), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV; n = 7 [25,[36][37][38]41,44,45]), ankle-brachial pulse wave velocity (baPWV; n = 4 [20,21,26,32]), carotid distensibility (CD; n = 3 [36][37][38]), nitrite/nitric oxide (NO; n = 2 [23,31]), flow-mediated brachial dilatation (FMD; n = 2 [19,32]), the reactive hyperaemia index (RHI; n = 2 [34,38]), blood pressure complexity (n = 2 [20,21]), the heart-ankle vascular index (CAVI; n = 3 [22,26,27]), aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV; n = 2 [18,35]), the aortic augmentation index (aAIx; n = 1 [38]), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA; n = 1 [40]), homocysteine (Hcy; n = 2 [24,39]), the von Willebrand factor (vWF; n = 1…”