The analytic hierarchy process in decision-making for caprine health programmes

Maino, Mario; Pérez, Paloma Díaz; Oviedo, P.; Sotomayor, Gabriel; Abalos, Pedro

doi:10.20506/rst.31.3.2162

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…MCDA has been used extensively in the fields of environmental management, industry and business management (Aenishaenslin et al, 2013) but few studies have used MCDA to assess animal disease control options (Mourits et al, 2010;Cassidy et al, 2013;Brosig et al, 2016). However, MCDA have been used to prioritise animal diseases (Humblet et al, 2012;Maino et al, 2012;Del Rio Vilas et al, 2013;Brookes et al, 2014a) and to perform spatial risk assessments (Clements et al, 2006;Hongoh et al, 2011;East et al, 2013;Stevens et al, 2013).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stakeholder perceptions of foot-and-mouth disease control in South Africa

Roberts

Fosgate

2018

Preventive Veterinary Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) prevention and control is a challenge worldwide but the situation in southern Africa is particularly complex because the virus is endemic in wild African buffalo (Syncerus caffer). The objective of this study was to compare stakeholder perceptions of the FMD control methods employed to restrict FMD virus to the infected zone of South Africa. Data collection was performed using an online questionnaire distributed to FMD experts, government veterinarians, private livestock veterinarians, people involved within the wildlife sector, and "other" occupation groups including the general public. Data were also collected using semi-structured participatory group discussions with government animal health technicians (AHT) and communal cattle owners directly affected by FMD control measures. Evaluated control methods were the disease control fence bordering the western boundary of the Greater Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area, clinical surveillance of livestock, movement control of cloven-hoofed animals and products, and routine FMD vaccination of cattle. These management procedures were scored according to a set of technical, economic, and ethical criteria by stakeholders, who also weighted the criteria according to their perceived importance. Scores and weights were aggregated using an additive linear model to rank control methods. Sensitivity analysis was performed using a stochastic model to explore the effects of varying inputs and the exclusion of scores from randomly selected respondent groups on the ranking of control methods. The deterministic analysis assigned the highest ranking to the disease control fence and the lowest to routine vaccination of cattle. The fence had the highest ranking in 40% of the stochastic iterations, and second, third and fourth in 26%, 20% and 14% of iterations, respectively. The inputs from the AHT and people involved in the wildlife sector were the most influential for ranking the fence as the preferred control option. The most influential criteria were the feasibility of the fence as a control option and its influence on the economics of the communal cattle owners, livestock industry in the FMD free zone, and the government. The disease control fence was the highest ranking control option but further investigations are necessary to understand the reasons for stakeholder perceptions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stakeholder perceptions of foot-and-mouth disease control in South Africa

Roberts

Fosgate

2018

Preventive Veterinary Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Metode AHP dengan program expert choice digunakan untuk membuat keutamaan strategik yang diterapkan untuk berbagai bidang, termasuk kegiatan pertanian dan peternakan (Forman dan Selly, 2002;Karimi et al 2011;Maino et al, 2012;Paly et al, 2013; Ali dan Maryam 2014; Giri dan Nejadhashemy 2014; Alitaneh dan Golsheiky 2015). Teknik ini digunakan untuk mengurai proses keputusan yang rumit menjadi keputusan yang lebih sederhana sehingga dapat ditangani dengan mudah.…”

Section: Analisis Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp)unclassified

Strategi Pengelolaan Usaha Jasa Rumah Pemotongan Hewan Ruminansia Secara Berkelanjutan (MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE RUMINANT-CATTLE SLAUGHTERHOUSE (RC-S) SERVICES)

Maharani

Sumardjo²,

Eriyatno³

et al. 2017

jveteriner

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pemotongan hewan yang tidak terkendali mengakibatkan penurunan ketersediaan jumlah dan mutu air, hewan, dan pangan asal ternak yang tidak sesuai kriteria aman-sehat-utuh-halal (ASUH). Tujuan penelitian adalah menganalisis dan mengukur peubah-peubah penting yang diperlukan untuk menyusun model dan merancang rencana strategik pengelolaan usaha jasa rumah pemotongan hewan ruminansia secara berkelanjutan. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah Multi Dimensional Scaling (MDS) atau rap-slaughterhouse, Monte Carlo, dan Analytical Hierarchy Process. Hasil analisis mendapatkan beberapa faktor-faktor penting, yaitu ketersediaan air bersih dan status kesehatan hewan untuk dimensi ekologi; kesediaan melaksanakan perlakuan yang higienis dan sanitasi pada tingkatan skala usaha; orientasi usaha jasa; ketersediaan hewan; pengaturan jadwal waktu pemotongan untuk dimensi ekonomi; keselamatan dan keamanan pekerja (dimensi sosial); ketidaktaatan penggunaan sarana dan prasarana oleh pengelola, pekerja dan pengguna jasa; kurang dipenuhinya persyaratan rangka bangunan (dimensi peraturan); dan teknologi pengolahan (dimensi teknologi). Strategi prioritas yang dihasilkan adalah pelayanan penyediaan pangan asal ternak layak untuk dijadikan komponen yang wajib dalam program ketahanan pangan melalui program pembangunan dan renovasi rumah pemotongan hewan ruminansia yang efektif. Kata-kata kunci: rumah pemotongan hewan ruminansia; strategi; Analisis Multi Dimensional Scaling; Monte Carlo; Analytical Hierarchy Process.

show abstract

Der Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): Eine Methode zur Entscheidungsunterstützung im Gesundheitswesen

Mühlbacher

Kaczynski

2013

PharmacoEcon. Ger. Res. Artic.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The analytic hierarchy process in decision-making for caprine health programmes

Cited by 8 publications

References 1 publication

Stakeholder perceptions of foot-and-mouth disease control in South Africa

Stakeholder perceptions of foot-and-mouth disease control in South Africa

Strategi Pengelolaan Usaha Jasa Rumah Pemotongan Hewan Ruminansia Secara Berkelanjutan (MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE RUMINANT-CATTLE SLAUGHTERHOUSE (RC-S) SERVICES)

Der Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): Eine Methode zur Entscheidungsunterstützung im Gesundheitswesen

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About