The Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Clinical Sample of United Arab Emirates (UAE) Nationals

Coelho, Olga; Pires, Rute; Ferreira, Ana Sousa; Gonçalves, Bruno; Alkhoori, Samia A.; Sayed, Mohamed El; El-Rasheed, Amany H.; Belhoul, Sara; AlJassmi, Maryam; Stocker, Joana

doi:10.5993/ajhb.44.6.5

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Secondly, the five-factor structure of both DSM-5 and ICD-11 models yielded a distinct factor of Compulsivity/Anankastia, which aligns with the ICD-11 trait framework but not the DSM-5 framework. This is consistent with findings from EFA analysis of clinical PID-5 data from the United Arab Emirates (25), which yielded a distinct Compulsivity factor (i.e., Rigid Perfectionism and Perseveration), while facets of Disinhibition loaded on Antagonism and Negative Affectivity. Moreover, this study from United Arab Emirates did not yield a separate factor of Psychoticism.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ICD-11 Classification of Personality Disorders and the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) operate with trait domains that contribute to the individual expression of personality disturbance (i.e., negative affectivity, detachment, dissociality, disinhibition, anankastia, and psychoticism). To date, these trait frameworks have not been investigated sufficiently in Middle Eastern cultures. Thus, the present study explored the structure of the ICD-11 and AMPD personality disorder (PD) trait domains in a large mixed sample from the Kurdistan zone of Iran. The ICD-11 and AMPD trait domains were operationalized using empirically supported algorithms for the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). The PID-5 was administered to a large mixed sample (N = 3,196) composed of 2,678 community and 518 clinical participants. Structural validity was investigated using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), whereas differential construct validity was explored by comparing clinical and community scores. Model fit and the expected factor structure were deemed appropriate for the ICD-11 trait model, but less adequate for the DSM-5 trait model (i.e., disinhibition did not emerge as a separate factor). All domain and facet scores showed significant differences between clinical and community subsamples with moderate to large effects, mostly for disinhibition and dissociality/antagonism while least for anankastia. The findings of the present study may suggest that the ICD-11 trait model is more cross-culturally fitting than the DSM-5 AMPD trait model, at least with respect to a large mixed sample from the region of Kurdistan. Accordingly, there is evidence for using PID-5 data for WHO ICD-11 purposes in this part of the World.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…The same applies to a study solely based on university students from Algeria (22). Beyond the aforementioned studies, only the AMPD trait model has been investigated in Middle Eastern cultures with some empirical support (23)(24)(25).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Suspiciousness items were not included in the psychoticism scale. The PID–5 appears to be psychometrically sound across cultures (Somma et al, 2019), including Asian populations (e.g., Coelho et al, 2020; Hong et al,. 2018), and relatively stable across time (Wright et al, 2015).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The dyadic effects of subclinical paranoia on relationship satisfaction in roommate relationships and college adjustment.

Springfield¹,

Ackerman²,

Pinkham³

2021

Journal of Abnormal Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Subclinical paranoia is associated with negative psychological and general health consequences including poorer social functioning. Despite extensive research on the outcomes of individuals with greater paranoia, the consequences of interacting with someone who is paranoid are less clear. As social functioning involves interactions between individuals, investigating associations between paranoia and relationship outcomes from a dyadic perspective may aid in elucidating the mechanisms underlying social dysfunction in subclinical paranoia. This study examined the trajectory of new roommate relationships over the course of the college semester. One hundred three same-sex roommate dyads were assessed on pathological personality traits at the beginning of the semester and on roommate relationship satisfaction and college adjustment at 2-week intervals. Individuals who were more paranoid reported lower satisfaction in their roommate relationship and poorer overall college adjustment. Importantly, individuals who lived with a more paranoid roommate also reported lower satisfaction in their roommate relationship. In contrast, elevated psychoticism, in either the individual or their roommate, was not associated with lower roommate relationship satisfaction. These findings demonstrate that the effects of subclinical paranoia extend beyond the paranoid individual to social partners as well. Further, poorer relationship satisfaction appears specifically related to paranoia and does not seem to be associated with increased psychoticism. General Scientific SummaryParanoid individuals experience poorer social functioning, but it is unclear how paranoia effects those who interact with paranoid individuals. This study used a dyadic data analysis approach to examine both the intra-and interpersonal effects of paranoia on roommate relationship satisfaction and overall college adjustment. Results revealed intrapersonal effects such that otherwise healthy undergraduate students with greater levels of paranoia reported lower satisfaction in their roommate relationship and poorer overall college adjustment. Interpersonal effects were also found indicating that individuals who lived with a roommate who was more paranoid also reported lower satisfaction in their roommate relationship but did not experience poorer college adjustment. Increased paranoia therefore has negative effects for both the paranoid individual and for those who are interacting with them. These effects did not extend to increased psychoticism and suggest a specific link between paranoia and poorer social outcomes.

show abstract

“…Five personality traits are obtained from this scale as follows: open-mindedness (α = 0.51), agreeableness (α = 0.66), negative emotionality (α = 0.64), extroversion (α = 0.57), and conscientiousness (α = 0.76). [39], this scale is composed of 25 items, rated on a scale from 0 (very false or often false) to 3 (very true or often true) [35]. Five scores derive from this scale as follows: negative affect (α = 0.74), detachment (α = 0.72), antagonism (α = 0.74), disinhibition (α = 0.70) and psychoticism (α = 0.78).…”

Section: Pathological Narcissistic Inventorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the pathological narcissistic inventory (PNI) and its brief form (B-PNI) in the Arabic language

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI) is a multidimensional measure developed to assess narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability. We aimed to validate the Arabic version of the original Pathological Narcissistic Inventory (PNI) and its brief form (B-PNI) in a community sample of Lebanese adults. Methods The English language PNI items were translated into Arabic following a rigorous translation, back-translation, and linguistic evaluation. A total of 401 participants were administered the translated PNI, as well as previously validated Arabic versions of the Big Five Inventory-2, the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the Impulsivity-8 Scale. Results Exploratory and confirmatory analyses supported the existence of seven first-order and two second-order factors of the PNI and B-PNI. Except for exploitativeness where females scored lower than males, no other significant differences by gender were observed for the remaining PNI subscale scores. Additionally, scores on all the subscales exhibited good reliability, while the associations with external measures supported the concurrent validity of the translated instrument. Conclusion The results of this study suggest that scores on the PNI and B-PNI are highly reliable with satisfactory concurrent and factorial validity, providing an assessment of broadly defined pathological narcissism among the Lebanese young adult population. The availability of the Arabic PNI and its brief form should facilitate improved understanding of pathological narcissism in Arabic cultures and the different factors that govern narcissistic personality pathology.

show abstract

The Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Clinical Sample of United Arab Emirates (UAE) Nationals

Cited by 10 publications

References 56 publications

The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model

The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model

The dyadic effects of subclinical paranoia on relationship satisfaction in roommate relationships and college adjustment.

Validation of the pathological narcissistic inventory (PNI) and its brief form (B-PNI) in the Arabic language

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About