“…From these, 311 were duplicates, and after screening of unique reports based on title/abstract, 56 studies remained. These went through full‐text screening for data quality so that 20 high‐quality studies were included in our systematic review [ 14 , 23 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]. Figure 1 depicts the search details, reasons for exclusion, and a schematic diagram of the overall selection process.…”