2022
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10101697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Association between Socio-Demographics and Mental Distress Following COVID-19 Vaccination—Mediation of Vaccine Hesitancy

Abstract: The COVID-19 vaccine has been administered to over 200 countries and regions. With the unprecedented vaccination scale and speed, vaccination correlated mental health issues should be paid precise attention to. This study aims to assess the association between socio-demographic factors and mental health following vaccination and to analyze the mediation effect of vaccine hesitancy. This study recruited 2112 individuals who took two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine in Shanghai. Structural equation modeling was per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the relationship between vaccine hesitancy, intolerance of uncertainty, and mental health factors and those who were vaccinated against COVID-19 and seasonal influenza in comparison to those who did not vaccinate against both or decided to be vaccinated with only one of these vaccines remains uninvestigated. Although some studies have investigated the relationship between psychological factors and vaccine hesitancy since the COVID-19 pandemic [ 23 , 28 , 29 ], these did not address the interplay between the aforementioned factors, as previously depicted [ 30 ]. Shedding light on these relationships will help policymakers design appropriate interventions to reduce vaccine hesitancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the relationship between vaccine hesitancy, intolerance of uncertainty, and mental health factors and those who were vaccinated against COVID-19 and seasonal influenza in comparison to those who did not vaccinate against both or decided to be vaccinated with only one of these vaccines remains uninvestigated. Although some studies have investigated the relationship between psychological factors and vaccine hesitancy since the COVID-19 pandemic [ 23 , 28 , 29 ], these did not address the interplay between the aforementioned factors, as previously depicted [ 30 ]. Shedding light on these relationships will help policymakers design appropriate interventions to reduce vaccine hesitancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies, particularly one among Israelis28 and another in Indians,29 showed negative psychological outcomes after vaccination but a bidirectional association of vaccine hesitancy and mental health among Saudis 29. In support of the causal direction of vaccine hesitancy on psychiatric outcomes, Zhang et al found that vaccine hesitancy mediated the effect of sociodemographics on anxiety and depression among their Chinese study population 30. This information could be used in public health messaging to endorse vaccination among mentally ill populations and the general population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We measured intent to vaccinate, and attitudes may have changed by the time vaccine availability became widespread. This is likely given the role of social and news media in informing or misinforming the public regarding the development and distribution of the vaccine 30–32. Additionally, the wave 3 survey was administered beginning in February, which was about 3 months into the emergency use authorisation of the first available vaccine; consequently, rollout had been limited to frontline essential workers and high-risk individuals such as those ≥75 years or immunocompromised individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sobel test was employed to examine the mediating role of vaccine hesitancy. 53 Additionally, the RIT (Indirect effect/Total effect) and RID (Indirect effect/Direct effect) methods were used to estimate the proportion of mediating results explained by vaccine hesitancy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%