The associations between metacognition problems, childhood trauma and internalizing symptoms in healthcare workers working directly with patients infected with COVID-19

Demirdöğen, Ezgi Şen; Algedik, Pınar; Warikoo, Nishchint; Bahadır, Erdi; Akbiyik, Meral; Büyüktarakçı, Seda; Kadak, Muhammed Tayyip; Yavuz, Mesut

doi:10.1080/13548506.2021.1985147

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nine studies (22%; Dai et al, 2018 ; Fergus et al, 2022 ; Kollmann et al, 2016 ; Marino et al, 2020 ; Melli et al, 2018 ; Schutze, Rees, Smith, Slater, Catley, & O'Sullivan, 2019 ; Sen Demirdogen et al, 2021 ; Yoshida et al, 2012 ) were evaluated to have relatively high quality, scoring a minimum of 65% on the QATSDD ( Supporting Information ). The remaining studies were evaluated to be of moderate quality, scoring between 50% and 64.9%.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One high quality study assessed the role of metacognitive beliefs as a mediator between childhood trauma and depression, anxiety, stress and somatic symptoms in a sample of adult healthcare workers working directly with COVID-19 patients (Sen Demirdogen et al, 2021). Using the DSM-5 APA Somatic Symptom Inventory to assess somatic symptoms, results demonstrated a significant positive correlation between somatic symptoms and metacognitive beliefs (r = .34).…”

Section: Somatic Symptoms and Metacognitionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A systematic review evaluating metacognitive beliefs in health anxiety and somatic distress

Keen

Kangas

Gilchrist

2022

British J Health Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increasing evidence suggests metacognitive beliefs may underpin transdiagnostic mechanisms maintaining psychopathology. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate published studies investigating the role of metacognitive beliefs in somatic distress in adult samples. Method: A systematic review was conducted, spanning five data bases. Studies meeting eligibility criteria were qualitatively synthesized. Results: Thirty-six studies (N = 12,390) met inclusion criteria with results suggesting a relatively consistent positive relationship between metacognitive beliefs and somatic distress. Both general and syndrome-specific metacognitive beliefs demonstrated relationships with not only emotional distress, but also physical symptoms themselves. Conclusions: Results are discussed in terms of conceptualizing somatic distress through the Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF) Model. Future research into metacognitive therapy for somatic populations is recommended.

show abstract