The average values of the nasal anthropometric measurements in 108 young Turkish males

Uzun, Ahmet; Akbaş, Hayati; Bilgiç, Sait; Emirzeoğlu, Mehmet; Bostancı, Özgür; Şahin, Bünyamin; Bek, Yüksel

doi:10.1016/j.anl.2005.05.004

Cited by 66 publications

(73 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The method was shown to be sufficiently reproducible since it was simple to achieve in a conventional setting, without the need for special equipment. 27,28 Several authors have published the profile and frontal characteristics of the face by collecting the data via anthropometric measurements [6][7][8][9][10] or by using threedimensional imaging techniques. 15,19,23,25,32 The determination of the reliability of 2-dimensional photogrammetry for soft tissue evaluation might provide clinicians the ability to assess soft tissue from both profile and frontal views after orthodontic treatment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[3][4][5] It is not possible to evaluate the soft tissues from the frontal view by using cephalometric radiographs. In addition to cephalometric radiographs, soft tissue evaluation has been carried out by means of different methods such as anthropometry, [6][7][8][9][10] two-or threedimensional photogrammetry, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] and three-dimensional imaging techniques. 24,25 Among these methods, two-dimensional photogrammetry has the advantage of being a basic, noninvasive, cost-effective, and quick method that requires minimal time and equipment in the assessment of soft tissue.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reliability of reference distances used in photogrammetry

Aksu¹,

Kaya²,

Kocadereli³

2010

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To determine the reliability of the reference distances used for photogrammetric assessment. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 100 subjects with mean ages of 22.97 6 2.98 years. Five lateral and four frontal parameters were measured directly on the subjects' faces. For photogrammetric assessment, two reference distances for the profile view and three reference distances for the frontal view were established. Standardized photographs were taken and all the parameters that had been measured directly on the face were measured on the photographs. The reliability of the reference distances was checked by comparing direct and indirect values of the parameters obtained from the subjects' faces and photographs. Repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bland-Altman analyses were used for statistical assessment. Results: For profile measurements, the indirect values measured were statistically different from the direct values except for Sn-Sto in male subjects and Prn-Sn and Sn-Sto in female subjects. The indirect values of Prn-Sn and Sn-Sto were reliable in both sexes. The poorest results were obtained in the indirect values of the N-Sn parameter for female subjects and the Sn-Me parameter for male subjects according to the Sa-Sba reference distance. For frontal measurements, the indirect values were statistically different from the direct values in both sexes except for one in male subjects. The indirect values measured were not statistically different from the direct values for GoGo. The indirect values of Ch-Ch were reliable in male subjects. The poorest results were obtained according to the P-P reference distance. Conclusions: For profile assessment, the T-Ex reference distance was reliable for Prn-Sn and SnSto in both sexes. For frontal assessment, Ex-Ex and En-En reference distances were reliable for Ch-Ch in male subjects. (Angle Orthod. 2010;80:670-677.)

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability of reference distances used in photogrammetry

Aksu¹,

Kaya²,

Kocadereli³

2010

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…But for a forensic expert, what's more important is the fact that the shape of the nose is unique with respect to ethnicity, race, and sex. Therefore, determining external nose angles also provides norms for ethnic and racial differences [1][2][3]. Racial and ethnic differences have been the focus of investigations lately [4,5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Morphometric Analytical Study of External Nose Angulations Using Photographic Technique to Derive Reference Values for Sex and Ethnic Group Differentiation in Forensic Identification

Siddapur

2017

Inter J Med Toxic Foren Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The size, shape andproportion of the nose is very valuable for cosmeticand plastic surgeons, undertaking repair and reconstruction of the nose [15]. Present studydemonstrated that there were racial dimorphism in nasal ergonomics.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 50%