The Biological as a Double Limit for Artificial Intelligence: Review and Futuristic Debate

Abstract

This paper aims to identify to what extent artificial intelligence (AI) is biologically limited and to launch a debate on the issue of overcoming these limitations. To achieve our goal, we utilized a qualitative research methodology framework, providing an in-depth analysis of AI limitations formulated by prominent scholars within this field of specialization. We found that the biological boundary imposes a double limitation on AI, both from a gnoseological perspective and from a technological perspective. This twofold limitation of AI underpins the idea that as long as the biological cannot be understood, formalized, and imitated, we will not be able to develop technologies that mimic it. By adopting an original approach, our research paper focused on mapping out the twofold limitation of the biological with reference to the success of AI. Special attention was paid to the motivational analysis of this limitation in terms of human existence, the opportunity and utility to create artificial intelligences as superior to the human-like condition. We have opened the door for future debates on the need to decode cellular communication by understanding and developing a natural language of the living cell (N2LC). Based on the present research, we proposed that within the current technological context, biological computers (biocomputing) could represent a so-called invisible hand outstretched by biological systems towards AI.

Societal Technological Megatrends: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1982 to 2021

“…In this context, megatrends are manifested in human society as a result of the technologysociety relationship [29] amid the changes that dominate society as a whole [2,30], with a predominant emphasis on the technological side [31]. Thus, our attention is drawn to the study of R. Pęciak [18], entitled "Megatrends and their Implications in the Globalised World", in which an inventory of the authors in the field is made, with references to the main socio-technological megatrends for the period of 1982-2016, starting with Naisbitt [17] and concluding with Retief et al [32].…”

“…Therefore, from the perspective of analyzing the country of the corresponding author criterion (Figure 5), we noticed that in Scopus, the ranking of the first 15 countries was led by the United States of America with 116 papers, followed by Germany (87), Italy (30), the United Kingdom (29), Australia (20), and Finland (20). With less than 20 papers were: South Korea (19), China (19), Canada (17), Austria (16), the Netherlands ( 16), the Russian Federation (16), France (15), Spain (15), and Poland (11).…”

An Informal Ethics Auditing in Authorized Valuation for Business Sustainability in Romania

“…In the current societal conjuncture, dominated by technology and globalization [1], the triad of ethics, social responsibility and sustainability are part of the same value equation, in which individuals and companies have equally the moral duty to promote values and to respect the rules for the long-term protection of the society in which they live and carry out their activity. In such a value-based society, value is omnipresent [2] and involves a process of valorization [3] known under the definition of valuation.…”