2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The bioprosthetic versus mechanical valve debate: Unwinnable and increasingly irrelevant?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15,[17][18][19] Testing a TAVR device performance under patient-specific conditions would yield clinically relevant information that current ISO testing guidelines cannot provide. We evaluated the performance of a novel polymeric TAVR device, advocated as the future of TAVR technology by addressing many TAVR's clinical complications, 10,20,21 in order to optimize its design for better clinical performance prior to clinical trials. The deployment and hemodynamic performance of TAVR valves were studied in custom fabricated patient-specific calcified aortic valve replicas, reconstructed from CT scans of presurgical TAVR patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,[17][18][19] Testing a TAVR device performance under patient-specific conditions would yield clinically relevant information that current ISO testing guidelines cannot provide. We evaluated the performance of a novel polymeric TAVR device, advocated as the future of TAVR technology by addressing many TAVR's clinical complications, 10,20,21 in order to optimize its design for better clinical performance prior to clinical trials. The deployment and hemodynamic performance of TAVR valves were studied in custom fabricated patient-specific calcified aortic valve replicas, reconstructed from CT scans of presurgical TAVR patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%