2009
DOI: 10.2753/jec1086-4415140104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Business Value of Process Sharing in Supply Chains: A Study of RosettaNet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relational resources are key determinants of competitive advantage because they provide a firm with a unique resource barrier position in the supply chain (Chang & Shaw, 2009;Dyer & Singh, 1998;Griffith & Harvey, 2001;Griffith et al, 2006;Marcus & Anderson, 2006;Ranganathan et al, 2004). Relational benefits as an important element of relational resources are consistent with the value-based perspective (Ulaga & Eggert's, 2006).…”
Section: Relational Governance and Information Sharing In Supply Chainsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relational resources are key determinants of competitive advantage because they provide a firm with a unique resource barrier position in the supply chain (Chang & Shaw, 2009;Dyer & Singh, 1998;Griffith & Harvey, 2001;Griffith et al, 2006;Marcus & Anderson, 2006;Ranganathan et al, 2004). Relational benefits as an important element of relational resources are consistent with the value-based perspective (Ulaga & Eggert's, 2006).…”
Section: Relational Governance and Information Sharing In Supply Chainsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Resource-based view is a major theoretical perspective for analyzing specific relational resources in supply chains (Chang & Shaw, 2009;Griffith, Myers, & Harvey, 2006;Marcus & Anderson, 2006;Ranganathan, Dhaliwal, & Teo, 2004;Subramani, 2004). Relational resources are key determinants of competitive advantage because they provide a firm with a unique resource barrier position in the supply chain (Chang & Shaw, 2009;Dyer & Singh, 1998;Griffith & Harvey, 2001;Griffith et al, 2006;Marcus & Anderson, 2006;Ranganathan et al, 2004).…”
Section: Relational Governance and Information Sharing In Supply Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second key characteristic of IBPS is that implementation of these standards is resource intensive and requires adopting firms to have substantial technical and business process related expertise (Chang and Shaw 2009). These standards are typically based on XML-based protocols and may require service-oriented architecture (SOA) for successful deployment.…”
Section: Theoretical Background Toe Framework and Drivers Of Ibps Adomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IBPS provide specifications for interrelated, sequential tasks and business documents that are agreed upon and shared by trading partners to achieve a defined and common business objective (Bala and Venkatesh 2007). Articles published in academic and practitioner outlets have noted that despite potential benefits, the adoption and diffusion of IBPS are still limited (Bala and Venkatesh 2007, Chang and Shaw 2009, Malhotra et al 2005, Wailgum 2006). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation