2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2006.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The CALUX bioassay: Current status of its application to screening food and feed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of TEF WHO 2006 the correlation has improved (R 2 =0.91), but in this case the DR-CALUX® assay overestimated the levels 1.4-fold. This was somewhat unexpected since the new TEF values are much closer to the resulting relative potency values [10,40] in the bioassay. A selection of fish samples is taken from Tables 1 and 3 The relative 1997 TEF concentrations (percent) compared with the 2006 TEFs concentrations are given in the parentheses the DR CALUX® assay actually detects other dioxin-like compounds present in eel.…”
Section: Screening Samples Using the Dr Calux® Assaymentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the basis of TEF WHO 2006 the correlation has improved (R 2 =0.91), but in this case the DR-CALUX® assay overestimated the levels 1.4-fold. This was somewhat unexpected since the new TEF values are much closer to the resulting relative potency values [10,40] in the bioassay. A selection of fish samples is taken from Tables 1 and 3 The relative 1997 TEF concentrations (percent) compared with the 2006 TEFs concentrations are given in the parentheses the DR CALUX® assay actually detects other dioxin-like compounds present in eel.…”
Section: Screening Samples Using the Dr Calux® Assaymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…6), because the DR CALUX® assay sensitivity was not optimized for the very low concentrations at the time of the study. A further improvement in sensitivity was obtained by dissolving the extract in a smaller amount of DMSO [10]. Figure 6 compares the levels based on both TEF systems, showing a good relation between the DR CALUX® assay and GC-HRMS with an almost 1:1 relationship for TEF WHO 1997 .…”
Section: Screening Samples Using the Dr Calux® Assaymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the PCDD/F analyses in the world have been performed with GC-HRMS. In those studies where the CALUX technique was used, the focus was more on method development, on the comparison with the GC-HRMS method and on the screening of food and feed (Hoogenboom et al, 2006;Van Overmeire, Van Loco, Roos, Carbonnelle, & Goeyens, 2004). In addition, very little data on dl-PCBs are available in literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%