“The Cambridge Tradition” Reconsidered

Aslanbeigui, Nahid; Oakes, Guy

doi:10.1215/00182702-7202560

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At any rate, most of their ideas about the subject, and even their prejudices, are traceable to the contact they have enjoyed with the writings and lectures of the two economists who have chiefly influenced Cambridge thought for the past fifty years, Dr. Marshall and Professor Pigou. (Keynes 1922: vi) The notion of the 'Cambridge tradition', by contrast, only appeared many decades after Marshall's death (Aslanbeigui and Oakes 2018). Due to the established usage of the terms Cambridge School and Cambridge tradition in the secondary literature, a few words need to be offered as to why I instead employ the descriptor 'Marshallian'.…”

Section: The Marshallian Traditionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Theory of Speculation in the Marshallian Tradition: Marshall, Pigou, Lavington, and Keynes on the Microeconomics of Speculation

Stevens

2023

History of Economics Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

I, Riko Stevens, certify that:▪ This thesis has been substantially accomplished during enrolment in this degree.▪ This thesis does not contain material which has been submitted for the award of any other degree or diploma in my name, in any university or other tertiary institution.▪ In the future, no part of this thesis will be used in a submission in my name, for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of The University of Western Australia and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint-award of this degree.▪ This thesis does not contain any material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text.

show abstract

Section: The Marshallian Traditionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Theory of Speculation in the Marshallian Tradition: Marshall, Pigou, Lavington, and Keynes on the Microeconomics of Speculation

Stevens

2023

History of Economics Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Cambridge economic tradition and the distribution of the social surplus

Martins

2020

Cambridge Journal of Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Various research projects in economics developed at Cambridge share common philosophical presuppositions, within what can be termed as the Cambridge economic tradition. I argue here that the Cambridge economic tradition can be distinguished from other traditions in terms of its underlying ontology, methodology and ethics, and also in terms of the way in which those philosophical presuppositions are expressed in competing theoretical approaches to the distribution of the social surplus. I also distinguish between an economic tradition and a school of economics and note that various schools have existed within the Cambridge economic tradition. The various Cambridge schools can themselves be identified in terms of the specific analytical frameworks they adopted when addressing the distribution of the social surplus.

show abstract

“The Cambridge Tradition” Reconsidered

Cited by 2 publications

References 11 publications

The Theory of Speculation in the Marshallian Tradition: Marshall, Pigou, Lavington, and Keynes on the Microeconomics of Speculation

The Theory of Speculation in the Marshallian Tradition: Marshall, Pigou, Lavington, and Keynes on the Microeconomics of Speculation

The Cambridge economic tradition and the distribution of the social surplus

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About