The carrying capacity imperative: Assessing regional carrying capacity methodologies for sustainable land-use planning

Abstract

a b s t r a c tWhile some existing carrying capacity methodologies offer significant insights into the assessment of population carrying capacities, a comprehensive model is yet to be developed. This research identifies, examines and compares a range of methodological approaches to carrying capacity assessment and considers their relevance to future spatial planning. A range of key criteria are employed to compare various existing carrying capacity assessment models. These criteria include integrated systems analysis, dynamic responses, levels of risk, systemic constraints, applicability to future planning and the consideration of regional boundary delineation. It is suggested that by combining successful components from various authors, and collecting a range of interconnected data, a practical and workable system-based model may be achievable in the future.

Spatial Carrying Capacity in Kuta Tourism Area for Revisiting Tourists

“…Using comparative analysis, SEA in masterplan of East Java Province has not fully described how the environmental capacity could accommodate spatial activities. Lane (2010) conclude that carrying capacity ` 1806 assessment (CCA) is a vital tool by which to measure the inherent local and regional productive limits for a given area of land. From a spatial planning perspective, CCA informs not only the size of any development but also the systemic processes involved in its design.…”

Sustainable urban development: A review on urban carrying capacity assessment

“…The concept of human carrying capability was first coined by Thomas Malthus. Given the concerns on natural limited factors on earth, Malthus made the cautionary prediction that the earth can only support a limited human population in perpetuity (Lane, 2010). Malthus noted that the world's human population grows exponentially, whereas natural resources grow arithmetically.…”

Using Urban-Carrying Capacity as a Benchmark for Sustainable Urban Development: An Empirical Study of Beijing

“…Another feature of this assessment framework is that it accommodates a perspective over "dynamic time frames". Both sustainability and UCC should be viewed as "a continuing process rather than a single event" [15] (p. 1043). It means that the conditions of sustainability or UCC at one moment do not ensure the same status in various circumstances.…”