2012
DOI: 10.1080/13698575.2012.682977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The case of the lady who risked exploding: A study of multiple consequences and contested values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One case is sufficient at times to illustrate a point. For example, Heyman et al 9 explored the experiences of a female patient who had ‘risked exploding’, according to a colorectal nurse, by absconding from hospital to have sexual intercourse with her boyfriend immediately after anal cancer surgery. The aim of the study was to understand why one particular individual had behaved in such a medically risky and highly unusual way.…”
Section: Which Sampling Methods To Use?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One case is sufficient at times to illustrate a point. For example, Heyman et al 9 explored the experiences of a female patient who had ‘risked exploding’, according to a colorectal nurse, by absconding from hospital to have sexual intercourse with her boyfriend immediately after anal cancer surgery. The aim of the study was to understand why one particular individual had behaved in such a medically risky and highly unusual way.…”
Section: Which Sampling Methods To Use?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Articles on patient‐caregiver interactions and service uptake were primarily focused on understanding and improving or supporting patients' understandings of risk and responsibility (Heyman et al . , Mendick et al . , Sinding et al .…”
Section: Living With and Beyond Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Articles on patient-caregiver interactions and service uptake were primarily focused on understanding and improving or supporting patients' understandings of risk and responsibility (Heyman et al 2012, Mendick et al 2010, Sinding et al 2010 and their interactions with care-givers, stressing the social processes that shape decision-making, disclosure and interpretation of results (Gross 2012, Johansen et al 2012, Sarradon-Eck et al 2012Stacey et al 2009). These included decision-making beyond treatment, fertility preservation (Quinn et al 2008) and participation in early-stage trials (Jansen 2014).…”
Section: Identity and Subjectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Heyman et al (2012) offer a single case study of a woman who received successful treatment for anal cancer. The paper explores the ways in which one individual can put together multiple risk and value considerations in their own personal way.…”
Section: The Papers In This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%