The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale is an adequate screening instrument for depression and anxiety disorder in adults with congential heart disease

Moon, Ju Ryoung; Huh, June; Song, Jieqiong; Kang, I-Seok; Park, Seung Woo; Chang, Sung‐A; Yang, Ji-Hyuk; Jun, Tae-Gook

doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0747-0

Cited by 54 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, considering the fact that the Center of Epidemiological Survey-Depression Scale (CES-D) is a useful instrument to screen for depressive symptoms, 26 this study employed a Chinese-version CES-D 10-question form to measure the mental health of older adults. A study has demonstrated that this scale has a good internal consistency reliability among middle-aged and older adults in China.…”

Section: Variables Outcome Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

<p>Socioeconomic Inequality in Health Outcomes Among the Elderly: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study in China</p>

Sun

Lyu

Zhao

2020

RMHP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aim: Health is viewed as a form of human capital and a necessary basis for people to realize capabilities. Moreover, socioeconomic inequality in health outcome widens income inequality and exacerbates social inequality. The aim of this study is to measure socioeconomic inequality in health outcomes among the elderly in China. Methods: The data used in this study were sourced from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study in 2015, including 5643 participants aged 60 and above. Concentration curve and concentration index were applied to measure the extent of socioeconomic inequality in health outcomes among older adults. Furthermore, the decomposition method of concentration index proposed by Wagstaff was employed to quantify each determinant's contribution to the measured socioeconomic inequality in health outcomes. Results: The concentration index of Activity of Daily Living Scale and Center of Epidemiological Survey-Depression Scale score were −0.0064 and −0.0158, respectively, indicating pro-rich inequality in physical and mental health among the elderly. The decomposition analysis revealed that household income (41.15%), aged 70-79 (17.37%), being male (8.38%), and living in urban area (5.78%) were key factors to explain the pro-rich inequality in physical health. Furthermore, the results also suggested that household income (68.41%), being male (17.55%), having junior high school education (10.67%), and living in urban area (6.49%) were key factors to explain the pro-rich inequality in mental health. Conclusion: This study revealed that there are pro-rich inequalities in physical and mental health among the elderly in China, and the degree of pro-rich inequality in mental health is higher than that in physical health. Moreover, the results also suggested that household income is the biggest contributor to socioeconomic inequality in physical and mental health. Furthermore, this study found that educational attainment makes a substantial contribution to socioeconomic inequality in health outcomes, while the contribution of health insurance to health inequality is limited.

show abstract

Section: Variables Outcome Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

<p>Socioeconomic Inequality in Health Outcomes Among the Elderly: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study in China</p>

Sun

Lyu

Zhao

2020

RMHP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While the CESD is found to correlate adequately with clinical interview in many studies (e.g. Shinar et al ., 1986; Irwin et al , 1999; Moon et al ., 2017), there are some studies in which it is found to have a significant number of false positive diagnoses (Quiñones et al ., 2016; Vilagut et al ., 2016). If the CESD in this study over-estimated depression, then we would expect the actual depression prevalence to be lower than reported.…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

East African HIV care: depression and HIV outcomes

Meffert

Neylan²,

McCulloch

et al. 2019

Glob. Ment. Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Importance.Depression is a common co-morbidity for people living with HIV (PLWH) and is associated with elevated plasma HIV RNA levels. While depression correlates with deficits in antiretroviral (ARV) adherence, little data exist to inform the relationship between depression and HIV vial load more broadly.Objective.To examine the relationship between depression and viral load in the African Cohort Study (AFRICOS) independently of ARV adherence.Design.PLWH in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania underwent screening for depression using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD) upon enrollment at AFRICOS HIV care sites.Setting.AFRICOS is an ongoing prospective longitudinal cohort study enrolling HIV-infected adults at HIV care centers including sites in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. These sites are administered by President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief programs.Participants.HIV+ individuals were eligible if they were at least 18 years old, receiving HIV care at the enrolling clinic and consented to data and specimen collection.Main outcome measure.CESD.Results.Among 2307 participants, 18–25% met the CESD threshold for depression. Depression was associated with decreased ARV adherence (OR 0.59, p = 0.01). Higher scores on three CESD items were significantly associated with 209–282% higher viral load, independently of ARV adherence among participants on ARVs ⩾6 months.Conclusions.PLWH had high prevalence of depression on the CESD. Diverse depression symptoms were independently associated with increases in viral load, underscoring the need for comprehensive treatment of depression.

show abstract

“…This is an important consideration when patients with ‘history of stroke’ in their medical record were more likely to have severe stroke. Lastly, although clinical interview, the gold standard, was not used to diagnose depression, presence of depressive symptoms was assessed via the CES-D which has been well-validated, in both HF and stroke populations,24 to identify patients who are at high risk of developing a depressive disorder.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patients with heart failure with and without a history of stroke in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis of psychosocial, behavioural and clinical outcomes up to three years from the COACH trial

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo identify differences in psychosocial, behavioural and clinical outcomes between patients with heart failure (HF) with and without stroke.Design and participantsA secondary analysis of 1023 patients with heart failure enrolled in the Coordinating study evaluating Outcomes of Advising and Counselling in Heart failure.SettingSeventeen hospitals located across the Netherlands.Outcomes measuresDepressive symptoms (Centre for Epidemiological StudiesDepressionScale), quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, Ladder of Life Scale), self-care (European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale), adherence to HF management (modified version of the Heart Failure Compliance Questionnaire) and readmission for HF, cardiovascular-cause and all-cause hospitalisations at 18 months, and all-cause mortality at 18 months and 3 years.ResultsCompared with those without stroke, patients with HF with a stroke (10.3%; n=105) had twice the likelihood of severe depressive symptoms (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.27 to 6.28, p=0.011; OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.88, p=0.043) at 12 and 18 months, poorer disease-specific and generic quality of life (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.61 to 4.84, p<0.001; OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.50, p=0.019) at 12 months, poorer self-care (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.11, p=0.034; OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.61 to 5.11, p<0.0011) and HF management adherence (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.81, p=0.012; OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.72, p=0.004) at 12 and 18 months, higher rates of hospitalisations and mortality at 18 months and higher all-cause mortality (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.91, p=0.016) at 3 years.ConclusionsPatients with HF and stroke have worse psychosocial, behavioural and clinical outcomes, notably from 12 months, than those without stroke. To ameliorate these poor outcomes long-term, integrated disease management pathways are warranted.

show abstract

The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale is an adequate screening instrument for depression and anxiety disorder in adults with congential heart disease

Cited by 54 publications

References 23 publications

<p>Socioeconomic Inequality in Health Outcomes Among the Elderly: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study in China</p>

<p>Socioeconomic Inequality in Health Outcomes Among the Elderly: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study in China</p>

East African HIV care: depression and HIV outcomes

Patients with heart failure with and without a history of stroke in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis of psychosocial, behavioural and clinical outcomes up to three years from the COACH trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About