The challenge of obtaining information necessary for multi-criteria decision analysis implementation: the case of physiotherapy services in Canada

Abstract

BackgroundAs fiscal constraints dominate health policy discussions across Canada and globally, priority-setting exercises are becoming more common to guide the difficult choices that must be made. In this context, it becomes highly desirable to have accurate estimates of the value of specific health care interventions.Economic evaluation is a well-accepted method to estimate the value of health care interventions. However, economic evaluation has significant limitations, which have lead to an increase in the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). One key concern with MCDA is the availability of the information necessary for implementation. In the Fall 2011, the Canadian Physiotherapy Association embarked on a project aimed at providing a valuation of physiotherapy services that is both evidence-based and relevant to resource allocation decisions. The framework selected for this project was MCDA. We report on how we addressed the challenge of obtaining some of the information necessary for MCDA implementation.MethodsMCDA criteria were selected and areas of physiotherapy practices were identified. The building up of the necessary information base was a three step process. First, there was a literature review for each practice area, on each criterion. The next step was to conduct interviews with experts in each of the practice areas to critique the results of the literature review and to fill in gaps where there was no or insufficient literature. Finally, the results of the individual interviews were validated by a national committee to ensure consistency across all practice areas and that a national level perspective is applied.ResultsDespite a lack of research evidence on many of the considerations relevant to the estimation of the value of physiotherapy services (the criteria), sufficient information was obtained to facilitate MCDA implementation at the local level.ConclusionsThe results of this research project serve two purposes: 1) a method to obtain information necessary to implement MCDA is described, and 2) the results in terms of information on the benefits provided by each of the twelve areas of physiotherapy practice can be used by decision-makers as a starting point in the implementation of MCDA at the local level.

Using clinical practice variations as a method for commissioners and clinicians to identify and prioritise opportunities for disinvestment in health care: a cross-sectional study, systematic reviews and qualitative study

“…These include a variety of benchmarking tools and various multicriteria decision analysis methods such as PBMA, sociotechnical allocation of resources and the Portsmouth scorecard. 202 These methods vary in the extent of stakeholder input and the level of complexity and time required. Research comparing these methods as means of identifying and implementing disinvestment initiatives and exploring their optimal design in order to engage clinicians and the public in a collaborative and transparent decision-making process would help commissioners establish sustainable local investment and disinvestment procedures.…”

Healthcare decision‐making applications using multicriteria decision analysis: A scoping review

“…Assessing the value of treatment options was the objective of seven of them. The other papers used the MCDA process to assess criteria in setting priorities (Fedyaeva, Omelyanovsky, Rebrova, Khan, & Petrovskaya, ), assessing quality care (Dionne, Mitton, Macdonald, Miller, & Brennan, ), assessing drug harms (Nutt et al, ), evaluating regulatory decision‐making (Maro et al, ), improving outpatient services (Kuo et al, ), selecting waste water technologies (Lu et al, ), supporting HTA decision‐making processes (Kwon, Park, Byun, & Lee, ; Wilson, Sussex, Macleod, & Fordham, ), assessing a suitable model (Vasconcelos, Almeida, & Nobre, ), and evaluating the performance of medical devices (Lee et al, ).…”

A prospective 2-site parallel intervention trial of a research-based film to increase exercise amongst older hemodialysis patients

“…The assessments are adapted from the principles of a cardiorespiratory PT assessment [ 39 ] and will include: (a) a thorough review of the patient’s medical record, including consultation with attending interprofessional staff (nephrologist, renal nurse, dietician) as needed; and (b) a 45-min physical assessment (including screening tests of the musculoskeletal, neurological, integumentary, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems described below). This approach is essential to ensure the appropriate tailoring of exercise prescription to patient ability, which has been demonstrated to be a successful model within the context of cardiac rehabilitation [ 40 ]. Following patient assessments, the PT will also review patients’ physical fitness and activity outcomes and will integrate these data into a tailored exercise prescription for each individual patient.…”