2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-8095(01)00094-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cloud Ice Mountain Experiment (CIME) 1998: experiment overview and modelling of the microphysical processes during the seeding by isentropic gas expansion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed description of the sampling site can be found in a number of previous studies (Wobrock et al 2001;Venzac et al 2009). The station is located in a natural background area, restricted during winter, authorized to cars during the spring and autumn periods, and only to organized buses during the summer period.…”
Section: Sampling Site and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the sampling site can be found in a number of previous studies (Wobrock et al 2001;Venzac et al 2009). The station is located in a natural background area, restricted during winter, authorized to cars during the spring and autumn periods, and only to organized buses during the summer period.…”
Section: Sampling Site and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak is more than a few hundred meters above the tree-line. The station is equipped with extensive facilities to measure aerosol cloud interactions (Sellegri et al, 2003), as well as physical, chemical and biological processes in clouds (Amato et al, 2007;Marinoni et al, 2004;Wobrock et al, 2001), both continuously and comprehensively. The site is at an intermediate altitude and the variability of the atmospheric composition is explained by a regular transition from free tropospheric/residual layer to boundary layer conditions.…”
Section: Puy De Domementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we can reject the hypothesis of the airflow heterogeneity as the cause of the differences between the microphysical measurement data. For additional information about the site description, see Bain and Gayet (1983) and Wobrock et al (2001). During the campaign, a Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe SPP-100 model and two Cloud Droplet Probes (CDP1 and CDP2) were installed in the sampling section of the wind tunnel (see Fig.…”
Section: G Guyot Et Al: Cloud-microphysical Sensors Intercomparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%