2009
DOI: 10.17221/42/2009-agricecon
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The competitiveness and comparative advantage of the Slovak and the EU agri-food trade with Russia and Ukraine

Abstract: The paper investigates comparative advantages and competitiveness of Slovak and the EU 27 agri-food trade in markets of two countries: Russia and Ukraine. Our aim is to see the dynamics of the agri-food trade for the analyzed countries especially in the post-accession period. Applying a trade dataset from the EUROSTAT and based on the approach applied by Bojnec and Fertő (2006), we describe the pattern of agri-food trade in Slovakia and the EU using the Balassa index. The extent of trade specialization exhibit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
32
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For particular product groups, greater variation was observed, with generally stable (unstable) patterns of variation for product groups with the comparative disadvantage (advantage). Qineti et al (2009) analysed the competitiveness and comparative advantage of the Slovak and the EU agri-food trade with Russia and Ukraine and found that the comparative advantage had been lost for a number of product groups over time, though the results for the individual product groups varied significantly. Bojnec and Fertő (2009) searched for the agro-food trade competitiveness of the Central European and Balkan countries and showed that the bulk primary raw agricultural commodities had higher and more stable relative trade advantages compared to the consumer-ready foods, implying competitiveness shortcomings in the food processing and in international food marketing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For particular product groups, greater variation was observed, with generally stable (unstable) patterns of variation for product groups with the comparative disadvantage (advantage). Qineti et al (2009) analysed the competitiveness and comparative advantage of the Slovak and the EU agri-food trade with Russia and Ukraine and found that the comparative advantage had been lost for a number of product groups over time, though the results for the individual product groups varied significantly. Bojnec and Fertő (2009) searched for the agro-food trade competitiveness of the Central European and Balkan countries and showed that the bulk primary raw agricultural commodities had higher and more stable relative trade advantages compared to the consumer-ready foods, implying competitiveness shortcomings in the food processing and in international food marketing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The considerable loss of the comparative advantage is evident in several papers (see e.g. Fertő 2008;Qineti et al 2009;Jámbor 2013). …”
Section: Specialisation Of European Ham Tradementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative advantage is proven if the RCA1 index value is greater than 1. If, however, the result of the index is less than 1, it may be asserted that the given country exhibits a competitive disadvantage in the case of the given commodity or group of commodities (Qineti et al 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Latruffe, L. [12] categorized the existing measures into two groups: trade measures, including real exchange rate and relative real exchange rates [15], purchasing power parity [16], Revealed comparative advantage, relative export advantage, relative import advantage, export market shares, net export index [17][18][19][20], and Strategic management measures, consists of domestic resource costs [21], social cost-benefit [22], costs of production [23], Profitability [24], Productivity and efficiency [25]. With the help of Regressions, Correlation and ranking analysis, Cluster analysis, researchers analyzed defining factors that influence the competitiveness of agricultural products, including farm size [26], farm specialisation [27], farm manager age, education [28], sophistication of consumers [17], government intervention, public expenditures [29].…”
Section: Competitiveness Of Agricultural Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%