2020
DOI: 10.23736/s0022-4707.20.10050-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The correlation between clinical and ultrasound evaluation of anterior talofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament tears in athletes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 In addition to the binary classification of injury status, 2 of the 14 studies also assessed the level of agreement for ordinal injury grading between index and reference testing. 8,21 The reference standards used were arthrography 19,49,50,[63][64][65] (n = 6), arthroscopy or surgery 8,41 (n = 2), MRI 14,23 (n = 2), and ultrasound 11,21,26,38 (n = 4). Two of the 6 studies using arthrography as the reference standard did not aim to differentiate between the affected ligaments during reference testing, counting any ligament sprain as a positive finding.…”
Section: Study Characteristics and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…11 In addition to the binary classification of injury status, 2 of the 14 studies also assessed the level of agreement for ordinal injury grading between index and reference testing. 8,21 The reference standards used were arthrography 19,49,50,[63][64][65] (n = 6), arthroscopy or surgery 8,41 (n = 2), MRI 14,23 (n = 2), and ultrasound 11,21,26,38 (n = 4). Two of the 6 studies using arthrography as the reference standard did not aim to differentiate between the affected ligaments during reference testing, counting any ligament sprain as a positive finding.…”
Section: Study Characteristics and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies were retrospective reviews, 8 , 26 the rest being diagnostic case-control, 23 clinical trials, 63 or prospective cohort studies (n = 10). 11 , 14 , 19 , 21 , 38 , 40 , 49 , 50 , 64 , 65 Studies included an aggregate of 2391 participants. The proportion of women within each study ranged from 23% to 51%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations