2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20162624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The correlation between maternal hypomagnesemia and preterm labour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
17
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in accordance with the studies of Mahmoud et al, and Khani et al, who also reported that 85% and 90% patients with preterm labour were housewives. 8,10 In the present study, 70%, 22% and 8% patients with preterm labour and 55%, 32% and 13% with term labour belonged to low, middle and high socioeconomic class respectively, the difference being statistically significant (p=0.04). Bhat et al, found patients with preterm labour belonging to low socioeconomic class were significantly higher than the middle and higher socioeconomic classes (58% in preterm labour patients and 45% in term, p<0.05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 41%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This result is in accordance with the studies of Mahmoud et al, and Khani et al, who also reported that 85% and 90% patients with preterm labour were housewives. 8,10 In the present study, 70%, 22% and 8% patients with preterm labour and 55%, 32% and 13% with term labour belonged to low, middle and high socioeconomic class respectively, the difference being statistically significant (p=0.04). Bhat et al, found patients with preterm labour belonging to low socioeconomic class were significantly higher than the middle and higher socioeconomic classes (58% in preterm labour patients and 45% in term, p<0.05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 41%
“…9 The mean maternal age in our study (24.96 years for preterm group and 25.04 years for term group) was consistent with the studies of Mahmoud et al, (24.31 versus 26.52 years) and Jenabi et al, (24.56 vs. 25.18 years). 8,9 However, it was lower in preterm group as compared to study conducted by Bhat et al, (28.63 years). 7 The difference can be explained due to early age of marriage and lesser use of contraceptives methods in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations