2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cosmic atomic hydrogen mass density as a function of mass and galaxy hierarchy from spectral stacking

Abstract: We use spectral stacking to measure the contribution of galaxies of different masses and in different hierarchies to the cosmic atomic hydrogen (HI) mass density in the local Universe. Our sample includes 1793 galaxies at z < 0.11 observed with the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope, for which Sloan Digital Sky Survey spectroscopy and hierarchy information are also available. We find a cosmic HI mass density of Ω HI = (3.99 ± 0.54) × 10 −4 h −1 70 at z = 0.065. For the central and satellite galaxies, we obta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare the optical size, total stellar mass (M * ), specific angular momentum (via the q parameter), and (NUV-r)+μ *based approaches for galaxies with stellar masses between 10 9 and 10 11 M . The first three definitions are calibrated on central galaxies within 1.5σ from the SHARK main sequence of star-forming c Indeed, while SHARK shows improvements over previous semi-analytical models in reproducing galaxy scaling relations, there are still clear limitations when it comes to matching the gas properties of galaxies across environments (e.g., Hu et al 2020).…”
Section: A Direct Comparison Of Different Gas Deficiency Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compare the optical size, total stellar mass (M * ), specific angular momentum (via the q parameter), and (NUV-r)+μ *based approaches for galaxies with stellar masses between 10 9 and 10 11 M . The first three definitions are calibrated on central galaxies within 1.5σ from the SHARK main sequence of star-forming c Indeed, while SHARK shows improvements over previous semi-analytical models in reproducing galaxy scaling relations, there are still clear limitations when it comes to matching the gas properties of galaxies across environments (e.g., Hu et al 2020).…”
Section: A Direct Comparison Of Different Gas Deficiency Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By binning galaxies according to a given property (e.g., stellar mass, colour, morphology, etc.) and stacking the corresponding HI spectra in each bin, it is possible to study gas scaling relations (e.g., Fabello et al 2011Fabello et al , 2012Geréb, Morganti, & Oosterloo 2014;Brown et al 2015Brown et al , 2017Healy et al 2019;Guo et al 2020;Hu et al 2020).…”
Section: Hi Stripping In Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we use a stacking method to explore how the H content and the specific star formation rate (sSFR) change with the group-centric radius. In Hu et al (2019, hereafter Paper I) and Hu et al (2020a), we have developed an interferometric stacking technique to measure the H content in galaxies and confirm that there is little evolution in cosmic H density (Ω H ) at low redshift ( < 0.11). This paper uses the same sample and technique to study the relation between H content and group-centric radius.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Following what done in Hu et al (2020a), we compare our results with the prediction from the S (Lagos et al 2018) semi-analytic model. We construct a lightcone with an area of ∼ 6900deg 2 and redshift range of = 0 − 0.1, containing all the galaxies with ★ ≥ 10 5 ⊙ (see Chauhan et al 2019 for details on how lightcones are constructed).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation