1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)36051-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cost of simultaneous surgical standby for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the latter would be inconsistent with the 1986 guidelines of the World Health Organization ISFC Task Force on Coronary Angiograms and Coronary Interventions (79) which state that "surgical standby is necessary for optimal safety of the procedure." That need is echoed by James M. Wilson and colleagues (78).…”
Section: Cost Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the latter would be inconsistent with the 1986 guidelines of the World Health Organization ISFC Task Force on Coronary Angiograms and Coronary Interventions (79) which state that "surgical standby is necessary for optimal safety of the procedure." That need is echoed by James M. Wilson and colleagues (78).…”
Section: Cost Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All of these disparities constrain the validity of current data for cost-effectiveness purposes. Although the importance placed on surgical standby can alter angioplasty cost estimates by a considerable amount, this element appears to be underestimated seriously in most published reports comparing PTCA to surgical revascularization (78). Furthermore, the use of data in current reports indicates that some patients approved for angioplasty would not have been candidates for CABG according to established criteria (70).…”
Section: Data Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation