The Critical Time-lapse between Various Restoration Placements and Subsequent Endodontic Intervention

Kwang, Sarah; Aminoshariae, Anita; Harding, Jarrod; Montagnese, Thomas A.; Mickel, Andre

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.005

Cited by 3 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The main purpose of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the time lapse between restoration placement and further intervention (endodontic treatment or extraction) as a result of pulp disease following restoration of the teeth. Only one other study has reported on the risk period of pulp deterioration subsequent to the placement of dental restorations (Kwang et al 2014). In that study, the mean time between restoration and the commencement of root canal treatment was 270 days (9 months), whereas in the current study, the risk period was almost double with the average time being 524 days (17 months) between restoration placement and the need for either root canal treatment or extraction.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 61%

“…Only one other study has reported on the risk period of pulp deterioration subsequent to the placement of dental restorations (Kwang et al . ). In that study, the mean time between restoration and the commencement of root canal treatment was 270 days (9 months), whereas in the current study, the risk period was almost double with the average time being 524 days (17 months) between restoration placement and the need for either root canal treatment or extraction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…The current study included teeth that had endodontic treatment as well as teeth that were extracted, whereas the Kwang et al . () study only included teeth that had endodontic treatment following the restoration.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…, Kwang et al . ). Permanent pulp damage is a significant reason for the biological failure of a restoration (Hawthorne & Smales ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…The finite lifespan of dental restorations can be influenced by both dentist and patient factors such as the patient's age at the time the restoration was placed, the frequency of attendance for treatment, the experience and skill level of the dentist as well as whether the restoration was an initial placement or a replacement (Bernardo et al 2007). Furthermore, the location of the tooth in the dental arch, the design of the restoration, the material used, the size of the restoration and the number of tooth surfaces are factors that affect the performance of a restoration (Opdam et al 2007, Kwang et al 2014. Permanent pulp damage is a significant reason for the biological failure of a restoration (Hawthorne & Smales 1997).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

An analysis of the timing and materials associated with pulp disease following restorative dental treatment

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 61%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…, Kwang et al . ). Permanent pulp damage is a significant reason for the biological failure of a restoration (Hawthorne & Smales ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

An analysis of the timing and materials associated with pulp disease following restorative dental treatment

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Pulpal Response to Crown Preparation and Cementation

Ptak¹,

Solanki²,

Andler³

et al. 2023

Journal of Endodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

British society of prosthodontics debate on the implications of the minamata convention on mercury to dental amalgam – should our patients be worried?

Austin¹,

Eliyas

Burke

et al. 2016

Dent Update

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2013, the Minamata Convention on Mercury called for a global phase-down of amalgam use, with a view to reduce environmental mercury pollution. This will significantly impact UK dentistry, given the still extensive use of amalgam in U.K. general dental practice. However, until now there has been little national discussion or debate. In Spring 2015, The British Society of Prosthodontics dedicated a significant part of its Annual Conference to debating the implications of this issue. Clinical case examples were discussed with audience interaction and voting facilitated using innovative Audience Response System Technology. A remarkable range of concerns and opinions were given. The debate elicited specific concerns amongst clinicians regarding the suitability of mercury-free alternatives to amalgam; particularly where cavities are large and extend beneath the gingival anatomy. There are also anecdotal reports of Dental Foundation (DF) dentists not being adequately taught the use of dental amalgam in undergraduate dental schools. CPD/CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Many clinicians, especially those treating patients for whom moisture control is challenging, feel that amalgam should remain available for clinicians to choose in certain clinical circumstances for the restoration of posterior teeth, even in the event of a complete phase-down.

show abstract

The Critical Time-lapse between Various Restoration Placements and Subsequent Endodontic Intervention

Cited by 3 publications

References 32 publications

An analysis of the timing and materials associated with pulp disease following restorative dental treatment

An analysis of the timing and materials associated with pulp disease following restorative dental treatment

The Pulpal Response to Crown Preparation and Cementation

British society of prosthodontics debate on the implications of the minamata convention on mercury to dental amalgam – should our patients be worried?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About