2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2003.03.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dark matter halo structure of “fossil” groups candidates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
56
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Yoshioka et al (2004) observe mass-tolight ratios as high as 1000, which are difficult to explain if these galaxies assembled their mass only through dynamical friction. Another uncertainty lies in the type of the galaxies from which the giant elliptical forms.…”
Section: Fossil Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Yoshioka et al (2004) observe mass-tolight ratios as high as 1000, which are difficult to explain if these galaxies assembled their mass only through dynamical friction. Another uncertainty lies in the type of the galaxies from which the giant elliptical forms.…”
Section: Fossil Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can lead to isolated giant elliptical galaxies, embedded in X-ray haloes with luminosities characteristic for entire galaxy groups. Such objects exist in the Universe (Vikhlinin et al 1999), either isolated (Yoshioka et al 2004) or surrounded by groups of less luminous satellite galaxies (Jones et al 2003;Khosroshahi et al 2006b; La Barbera et al 2009). One of the first systems has been reported by Ponman et al (1994) coining the term "fossil group", and Jones et al (2003) have introduced general selection criteria.…”
Section: Fossil Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also noted a central point source, possibly an AGN. Yoshioka et al (2004) analyzed ASCA data for NGC 1132 and classified it as an "isolated X-ray overluminous elliptical galaxy" (IOLEG). For ESO 306-017, we use the results from Sun et al (2004), who analyzed Chandra and XMM-Newton data and averaged the results of these analyses.…”
Section: Comparisons With X-ray Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there is no consensus on the mass-to-light ratios (M/L) of FGs; measurements span from ∼100 M /L (Khosroshahi et al 2004) to ∼1000 M /L (Vikhlinin et al 1999;Yoshioka et al 2004;Cypriano et al 2006) in the R-band, but there is a tendency toward higher values Eigenthaler & Zeilinger 2012). Such high M/L values, together with the fact that FGs show unusually high L X /L opt ratios compared with typical galaxy groups, appear inconsistent with the assumption that FGs are formed by the merging of the members in ordinary galaxy groups (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All this together and the absent of L galaxies suggest that they arguably are old galaxy groups. Up to now more than one hundred galaxy groups have been classified as "fossil groups" by different studies (Ponman et al 1994;Jones et al 2003;Yoshioka et al 2004;Khosroshahi, Jones & Ponman 2004;Vikhlinin et al 1999;Voevodkin et al 2010;Santos, Mendes de Oliveira & Sodr 2007;Schirmer et al 2010;La Barbera et al 2009;Lopes de Oliveira et al 2010;Proctor et al 2011;Pierini et al 2011;Miller et al 2012;Eigenthaler & Zeilinger 2009). However, the selection criteria are not strictly met in all studies and vary from the convention introduced by Jones et al (2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%