2004
DOI: 10.1080/027868290502290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ddevelopment and Designation Testing of a New USEPA-Approved Fine Particle Inlet: A Study of the USEPA Designation Process

Abstract: This article discusses the practical challenge of meeting USEPA requirements for equivalency between novel particulate matter monitoring instruments and the USEPA WINS PM 2.5 Impactor (i.e., the Federal Reference Method sampler for fine particulate matter). A project was undertaken to develop a new PM 2.5 instrument in which the WINS impactor was substituted by a cyclone, to give superior performance over long sampling periods under heavy loading. Empirical cyclone models were used to develop a new generation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, cyclonic devices, such as those used in this study, were demonstrated to have significant advantages over impactors for extended operation and high mass loadings. (37) In this study the MCSA successfully segregated mass loadings exceeding 600 mg with no detectable deterioration of the cyclone cut point performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, cyclonic devices, such as those used in this study, were demonstrated to have significant advantages over impactors for extended operation and high mass loadings. (37) In this study the MCSA successfully segregated mass loadings exceeding 600 mg with no detectable deterioration of the cyclone cut point performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…10,11 21 showed that PM 2.5 samplers with VSCCs satisfied EPA criteria for equivalency. 22 As shown in Table 3 12 Several of the continuous instruments and PM speciation samplers have been equipped with a SCC or VSCC.…”
Section: Size-selective Inletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is similar to aerosol monitor tests (Vanderpool et al 2001; Kenny et al, 2004) used to assess monitor stability and response time (NIOSH, 2012). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%