2017
DOI: 10.1007/jhep12(2017)008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The decay constants fD and f D s $$ {f}_{D_s} $$ in the continuum limit of Nf = 2 + 1 domain wall lattice QCD

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
87
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the quark-disconnected contribution we adopt the additional long-distance error discussed in Ref. [29] (L) and for the charm contribution we propagate uncertainties from the global fit procedure [22] (M). Systematic errors of the R-ratio computation are taken from Ref.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the quark-disconnected contribution we adopt the additional long-distance error discussed in Ref. [29] (L) and for the charm contribution we propagate uncertainties from the global fit procedure [22] (M). Systematic errors of the R-ratio computation are taken from Ref.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compute Π(q 2 ) using the kernel function of Refs. [11,12] Π(q 2 ) − Π(q 2 = 0) = t cos(qt) − 1 q 2 + 1 2 t 2 C(t) (3) arXiv:1801.07224v1 [hep-lat] 22 Jan 2018 with C(t) = 1 3 x j=0,1,2 J j ( x, t)J j (0) . With appropriate definition of w t , we can therefore write a µ = t w t C(t) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This gauge ensemble has been generated by the RBC/UKQCD collaboration using the Iwasaki gauge action [41,42]. The inverse lattice spacing of this ensemble has been determined without QED as a −1 = 1.78 GeV [43]. The bare sea quark masses are am l = 0.005 and am s = 0.04 for light and strange quarks, respectively.…”
Section: Computational Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The averaged results from experiments and LQCD calculations are compatible at 2σ with competing but smaller uncertainties from the LQCD calculations. In addition, recent results from N f = 2 + 1 and N f = 2 + 1 + 1 calculations with individual uncertainties similar to the 2016 averaged ones are provided by RBC/UKQCD [7] and Fermilab Lattice/MILC [8], respectively. While lattice calculations need to include QED effects non-perturbatively in the future, also more precise experimental measurements are needed for further comparisons.…”
Section: Leptonic and Semileptonic Decaysmentioning
confidence: 99%