2003
DOI: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1602_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development and Evaluation of a Speech-to-Sign Translation System to Assist Transactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recognition rate obtained with this approach improved on the results that have been reported for other SL synthesizers [60,25,61] both for isolated signs and for complete sentences. However, as we previously stated, only the isolated sign recognition rates can be compared.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recognition rate obtained with this approach improved on the results that have been reported for other SL synthesizers [60,25,61] both for isolated signs and for complete sentences. However, as we previously stated, only the isolated sign recognition rates can be compared.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Previous work [60,25] has attempted to evaluate SL translation systems as whole by considering sign quality and complexity of interaction with the avatar. San-Segundo et al [61] proposed a 2D avatar for presenting fifty different gestures from the fingerspelling dictionary; in their evaluation of this system, more than 70% of the letters were correctly recognized in a first attempt and 100% were recognized in a second attempt after the users were presented with their earlier results.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sign recognition rates of deaf user have been reported to be lower than the results obtained when the users who evaluated the system were SL interpreters (López-Colino and Colás, 2011). The acceptance of synthetic signed messages is also lower when evaluated by deaf users (Cox et al, 2003). Deaf users provide the baseline of the system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of our claims was tested through user evaluations, with respect to SL synthesis (Cox et al, 2003;Huenerfauth et al, 2008;Huenerfauth, 2008) and visual prosody (Hartmann et al, 2005a); user evaluation is the only approach to test a system or a hypothesis of this kind. The main difference 15 between the two topics is the number of users who participate in the experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recognition rate of ViSiCAST system is 81% for isolated signs and 61% for complete phrases [5]. The experiments allowed three views of each video.…”
Section: Synthetic Sl Messages Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%