2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2021.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development, inter-rater agreement and performance of a hierarchical procedure for setting the rest-interval in actigraphy data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2012 ). In cases of obvious misclassifications of rest periods, or large discrepancies between actigraphy and sleep diary data, rest interval onsets and offsets were manually adjusted according to event markers, activity, light levels, and/or sleep diaries using a standardized procedure ( Follesø et al. 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2012 ). In cases of obvious misclassifications of rest periods, or large discrepancies between actigraphy and sleep diary data, rest interval onsets and offsets were manually adjusted according to event markers, activity, light levels, and/or sleep diaries using a standardized procedure ( Follesø et al. 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For qualitative assessment of the actigraphy data, participants filled out sleep diaries based on the Consensus sleep diary each morning (Carney et al 2012). In cases of obvious misclassifications of rest periods, or large discrepancies between actigraphy and sleep diary data, rest interval onsets and offsets were manually adjusted according to event markers, activity, light levels, and / or sleep diaries using a standardized procedure (Follesø et al 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 15 Studies have shown that high inter-rater agreement for manually scored data (e.g., α = 0.975 for rest onset, and α = 0.998 for rest offset) can be achieved with clearly defined scoring criteria by trained researchers. 17 However, a limitation of manually scored actigraphy is the possibility of human error and the time requirement of analyzing large groups of participant data. 5 7 Recent advances in technology have seen the emergence of automatically-scored, commercially-available actigraph devices 5 14 and the accuracy and relability of these devices has improved considerably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%