2010
DOI: 10.2172/981787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development of a Parameterized Scatter Removal Algorithm for Nuclear Materials Identification System Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A scattering correction can be made to compensate for forward neutron scattering (Grogan, 2010) but was not carried out on this set of measurements. While a scattering correction would improve the accuracy of the aluminum neutron attenuation value, it would worsen the polyethylene attenuation value, because very little forward neutron scattering occurs inside polyethylene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A scattering correction can be made to compensate for forward neutron scattering (Grogan, 2010) but was not carried out on this set of measurements. While a scattering correction would improve the accuracy of the aluminum neutron attenuation value, it would worsen the polyethylene attenuation value, because very little forward neutron scattering occurs inside polyethylene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each simulation contained 1×10 7 source particles. Both simulations were post-processed using PolimiPP software (Grogan, 2010), which recorded the energy deposited in the NaI detector by each photon that could be correlated with a source neutron. Photon peaks are visible from both simulations, and it is visibly apparent that the gamma spectra for the two different materials are very different.…”
Section: Mcnp-polimi Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, when comparing the data from NMIS to simulations done in PoliMi and parsed by the post processor written by B. Grogan (39) and J. Henkel, there have been some large differences. In general, it has been noted that small detectors are much better modeled by simulations than larger detectors (34).…”
Section: A1 Overview Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conventional x-ray CT this problem is mostly dealt with hardware solutions such as high Z materials anti-scatter grids which are part of the detecting system, preventing the scattered photons from reaching the detector. There are also numerous attempts to solve the issue by using software corrections [1][2][3]. Both are complicated, do not solve the problem completely and may eventually induce new artifacts.…”
Section: Scattermentioning
confidence: 99%