2022
DOI: 10.1111/cdep.12476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of cognitive reflection

Abstract: What do cows drink? The correct answer is water, but many are tempted to say milk. The disposition to override an intuitive response (milk) with a more analytic response (water) is known as cognitive reflection. Tests of cognitive reflection predict a wide range of skills and abilities in adults. In this article, we discuss the construction of a developmental version of the cognitive reflection test and explore how it predicts rational thinking and normative thinking dispositions in elementary school‐aged chil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding highlights the nuanced nature of the relationship, suggesting that the protective effect of systematic information processing against phishing susceptibility is contingent upon individuals’ level of financial knowledge. This finding aligns with the Cognitive Reflection model (Shtulman & Young, 2023), which posits that individuals’ ability to override intuitive and erroneous responses is influenced by their domain-specific knowledge. In the context of phishing, individuals with higher financial knowledge demonstrate a heightened understanding of the potential risks involved and are more proficient at leveraging systematic processing strategies to critically evaluate online messages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This finding highlights the nuanced nature of the relationship, suggesting that the protective effect of systematic information processing against phishing susceptibility is contingent upon individuals’ level of financial knowledge. This finding aligns with the Cognitive Reflection model (Shtulman & Young, 2023), which posits that individuals’ ability to override intuitive and erroneous responses is influenced by their domain-specific knowledge. In the context of phishing, individuals with higher financial knowledge demonstrate a heightened understanding of the potential risks involved and are more proficient at leveraging systematic processing strategies to critically evaluate online messages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In actuality, these scores ranged from 0 to 7 and averaged 2.6 ( SD = 1.6). Children’s CRT-D scores were strongly correlated with age ( r = .52, p < .001), consistent with previous studies (see Shtulman & Young, 2023).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Tests of cognitive reflection assess the propensity to monitor and correct an intuitive response. For instance, the Cognitive Reflection Test, Developmental Version (CRT-D; Young & Shtulman, 2020) consists of several brainteasers designed to elicit an intuitive, yet incorrect, response that children can correct upon further reflection, such as “Which weighs more: a pound of rocks or a pound of feathers?” Children who are better at answering such brainteasers demonstrate higher levels of rational thought and conceptual understanding (Shtulman & Young, 2023). They may also be better at using precedents and mechanisms to scrutinize their intuitions about possibility, especially after training.…”
Section: Similarity and Causalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important individual difference that might matter, though, is a person’s tendency to engage in cognitive reflection, which might facilitate counterintuitive responding among both children and adults. Children who engage in more cognitive reflection demonstrate more sophisticated modal reasoning (Shtulman et al, 2023), and cognitive reflection predicts rational thinking in both Chinese and American children (Gong et al, 2021; Shtulman & Young, 2023). But some cultures might promote the importance of using intuition over reflection, or vice versa (Buchtel & Norenzayan, 2008; Norenzayan et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%