The Development of Resource Sharing, Scholarly Communication, and the Role of Publishers in the Context of Academic Libraries

Abstract

Both commercial and noncommercial publishing have impacted interlibrary loan and other types of resource sharing, such as patrondriven systems, in a variety of ways. Interlibrary loan has always been a concern of publishers, with the possibility libraries would copy in "such aggregate quantities as to substitute for a subscription to or purchase" of a work (CONTU 1978). Exceptions and limits have been in place in the law and as guidelines for library copying for patrons and interlibrary loan since 1978. However, over the past five decades or so, as traditional print publications, electronic "Big Deals," licensing, and permissions have become increasingly unsustainable for library budgets, the open access (OA) movement has gained acceptance and has influenced resource sharing as well. OA materials are being used to fulfill resource-sharing requests, and researcher behavior may bypass traditional means of resource sharing altogether for greater speed and ease of access. Traditional publishing has found itself at a crossroads with the need to adapt as researchers increasingly accept new models of scholarly communication. There are plenty of moving parts in resource sharing today, and these are explored herein.

Balancing informed evaluation with efficiency: Applying copyright and licensing evaluation to reserves and interlibrary loan

“…Ultimately licensing restrictions would serve to hamper electronic resource sharing by adding layers of complications to copyright restrictions that already caused confusion with ILL practitioners. According to Cindy Kristof (2018), this over complication leads some ILL departments to refuse requests for electronic content all together.…”

The black crow of science and its impact: analyzing Sci-Hub use with Google Trends

“…Notably, journal subscriptions remain limited to institutions, including academies, universities and medical centers. As papers are exclusive, libraries cannot replace a journal subscription for another without depriving their users of potentially crucial access (Kristof, 2018). We are now facing added difficulties to limited access: previous studies raised that due to the restrictions on legal access to information, fraudsters initiatives as scholarly piracy have increased.…”