2020
DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2019.19577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diagnostic Ability of Ganglion Cell Complex Thickness-to-Total Retinal Thickness Ratio in Glaucoma in a Caucasian Population

Abstract: Introduction Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy characterized by retinal ganglion cell loss and thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL). 1,2 Glaucomatous visual field defects emerge after 30% of the retinal ganglion cells are lost. Therefore, structural tests are important in the early diagnosis and follow-up of glaucoma. 3 Previous optical coherence tomography (OCT) studies demonstrated peripapillary RNFL thinning in early Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the macular ganglio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results demonstrated that the average and sectoral pRNFL, mGCIPL, and mGCC were significantly thinner in the EG eyes than in the PPG eyes. These findings were consistent across several studies ( 26 , 29 , 34 , 38 41 , 43 , 44 ), whereas the results of eight studies were not significantly different in terms of the average or sectoral pRNFL thickness ( 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 35 37 , 42 ); two studies reported there was no significant difference in the EG eyes compared to the PPG eyes concerning mGCC thickness ( 28 , 36 ), and one study did not demonstrate a significant reduction in the EG eyes regarding the average and superior mGCIPL thickness ( 33 ). Currently, the exact biomechanisms of glaucomatous neurodegeneration remain poorly understood ( 1 , 55 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results demonstrated that the average and sectoral pRNFL, mGCIPL, and mGCC were significantly thinner in the EG eyes than in the PPG eyes. These findings were consistent across several studies ( 26 , 29 , 34 , 38 41 , 43 , 44 ), whereas the results of eight studies were not significantly different in terms of the average or sectoral pRNFL thickness ( 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 35 37 , 42 ); two studies reported there was no significant difference in the EG eyes compared to the PPG eyes concerning mGCC thickness ( 28 , 36 ), and one study did not demonstrate a significant reduction in the EG eyes regarding the average and superior mGCIPL thickness ( 33 ). Currently, the exact biomechanisms of glaucomatous neurodegeneration remain poorly understood ( 1 , 55 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The pooled results revealed that the pRNFL and mGCC were significantly thinner in the PPG eyes than those in the OHT eyes, which were consistent with several investigations ( 45 , 47 , 48 ). However, two studies reported that there was no difference in patients with PPG and OHT in terms of the average mGCC thickness ( 39 , 43 ); one study demonstrated that the average pRNFL thickness could not serve as a valued indicator for differential diagnosis ( 43 ), and another study showed that no difference was noted in the PPG eyes and OHT eyes regarding the superior mGCC thickness ( 46 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Across all key questions, 83 studies (reported in 96 publications, total 75 887 participants) were included (30 trials and 53 diagnostic accuracy studies) (Figure 2). Sixteen studies were carried forward from the 2013 reviews, and 67 studies were new.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifty-three studies evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests (reported in 59 publications, n = 65 464) (eTables 3-4 in the Supplement). Most studies evaluated spectral-domain OCT (29 studies, n = 11 434), tonometry (17 studies, n = 49 742), and visual field assessment (10 studies, n = 11 633). No study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a comprehensive ophthalmological examination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%