The disease burden attributable to 18 occupational risks in China: an analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017

Abstract

Background China has more than 18% of the global population and over 770 million workers. However, the burden of disease attributable to occupational risks is unavailable in China. We aimed to estimate the burden of disease attributable to occupational exposures at provincial levels from 1990 to 2017. Methods We estimated the summary exposure values (SEVs), deaths and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) attributable to occupational risk factors in China from 1990 to 2017, based on Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2017. There were 18 occupational risks, 22 related causes, and 35 risk-outcome pairs included in this study. Meanwhile, we compared age-standardized death rates attributable to occupational risk factors in provinces of China by socio-demographic index (SDI). Results The SEVs of most occupational risks increased from 1990 to 2017. There were 323,833 (95% UI 283,780 - 369,061) deaths and 14,060,210 (12,022,974 - 16,125,763) DALYs attributable to total occupational risks in China, which were 27.9 and 22.1% of corresponding global levels, respectively. For attributable deaths, major risks came from occupational particulate matter, gases, and fumes (PGFs), and for the attributable DALYs, from occupational injuries. The attributable burden was higher in males than in females. Compared with high SDI provinces, low SDI provinces, especially Western China, had higher death rates attributable to total occupational risks, occupational PGFs, and occupational injuries. Conclusion Occupational risks contribute to a huge disease burden in China. The attributable burden is higher in males, and in less developed provinces of Western China, reflecting differences in risk exposure, socioeconomic conditions, and type of jobs. Our study highlights the need for further research and focused policy interventions on the health of workers especially for less developed provinces in China to reduce occupational health losses effectively.

The global burden and attributable risk factors of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019: analysis based on the global burden of disease study 2019

“…People at high risk of exposure to benzene and formaldehyde include workers in paint factory, shoe factory, furniture factory, and decorator. With globalization, a large number of manufacturing factories have moved to underdeveloped regions [ 38 ]. Meanwhile, strict control of carcinogenic occupations prevalent in developed countries has not been fully implemented in underdeveloped regions.…”

The Global Burden and Attributable Risk Factors of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in 204 Countries and Territories from 1990 to 2019: Analysis Based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

“…People at high risk of exposure to benzene and formaldehyde include workers in paint factory, shoe factory, furniture factory, and decorator. With globalization, a large number of manufacturing factories have moved to underdeveloped regions (33). Meanwhile, strict control of carcinogenic occupations prevalent in developed countries has not been fully implemented in underdeveloped regions.…”

Asbestosis hospitalizations in Poland (2006–2016): results from the National Hospital Discharge Registry

“…in Louisiana, USA, data from the Current Population Survey (1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009) indicated that males comprised about 88% of the jobs, compared to 12% by females [4]. In China during 2006 and 2015, the level of burden of the disease attributable to asbestosis was higher in males than in females [26]. However, data on asbestos-related disease cases in one region in China in 1988-2014 showed a total of 625 patients (225 males and 400 females), 617 of whom were diagnosed with asbestosis [27].…”

“…In other countries, the occurrence of asbestos-related diseases may be conditioned by the State policy regarding restrictions on products made with the use of asbestos. In China, the burden of disease attributable to asbestosis had an upward trend for the period 2006-2015 [26]. A study in South Korea, based on data from 1998-2013, reported that the incidence of asbestos-related diseases tended to increase, even though asbestos stoppedbeing used [39].…”