2015
DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2015.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dual mobility poly liner: A worthwhile articulation choice?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 67 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In two of the largest revision studies to date, 1.7% overall instability rates over a 7.3 year follow up [15] and 5% over 7.7 years have been achieved [18]. Lombardi et al [17] compiled summary tables on both primary and revision dual mobility liners in regards to both component survival as well as dislocation rates. They showed consistently favorable rates, including their own data with one early dislocation (under a traumatic event), in 22 revisions (4.5%) over a 22-month follow up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two of the largest revision studies to date, 1.7% overall instability rates over a 7.3 year follow up [15] and 5% over 7.7 years have been achieved [18]. Lombardi et al [17] compiled summary tables on both primary and revision dual mobility liners in regards to both component survival as well as dislocation rates. They showed consistently favorable rates, including their own data with one early dislocation (under a traumatic event), in 22 revisions (4.5%) over a 22-month follow up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%