The Dutch–Flemish PROMIS Physical Function item bank exhibited strong psychometric properties in patients with chronic pain

Crins, Martine H. P.; Terwee, Caroline B.; Klausch, Thomas; Smits, Niels; Vet, Henrica C.W. de; Westhovens, René; Cella, David; Cook, Karon F.; Revicki, Dennis A.; Leeuwen, J. van; Boers, Maarten; Dekker, Joost; Roorda, Leo D.

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.011

Cited by 31 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 52 publications

(48 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The current study showed that the PROMIS-PF-GR had sufficient unidimensionality bi-factor analysis Omega H 0.82, ECV 0.70) This is in accordance with the original PROMIS PF developmental study as well as with three validation studies of this item bank in the Netherlands [11][12][13][14]. Unidimensionality is an important prerequisite to enable IRT-based scoring and this also makes it possible to compare T-scores of our custom short form to the original PROMIS item bank and other shorts forms.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Development of a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) short form for measuring physical function in geriatric rehabilitation patients

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To develop and test the validity of a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) short form for measuring physical function of geriatric rehabilitation patients. Methods Experts selected items from the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS v1.2 Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) item bank and proposed new items to develop the PROMIS-PF short form for geriatric rehabilitation (PROMIS-PF-GR). Patients evaluated its content validity. Structural validity was assessed by evaluating unidimensionality (confirmatory, exploratory, and bi-factor analyses [criterion: Omega H > 0.80 and ECV > 0.60]), local independence (criterion: residual correlation < 0.20) ,and monotonicity (criterion: H i -coefficient ≥ 0.30). Measurement invariance was assessed by evaluating Differential Item Functioning (DIF) between geriatric rehabilitation patients and people from the general population using ordinal logistic regression. Internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha (criterion: alpha ≥ 0.70). Results Experts selected 24 items from the PROMIS-PF item bank and proposed one new item which was not included in the short form. Patients considered the 24 items relevant and containing essential information. The PROMIS-PF-GR's psychometric properties were evaluated in 207 patients (mean age ± SD, 80.0 ± 8.3 year; 58% female). The 24 items were found to be sufficiently unidimensional (Omega H = 0.82, ECV = 0.70), locally independent (98.7% item pairs), and monotone (all ≥ 0.32). Five items were flagged for DIF, but their impact on the total score was negligible. Cronbach's alpha was 0.94. Conclusion The PROMIS-PF-GR was developed from the PROMIS-PF and has good content validity, structural validity, measurement invariance, and internal consistency in Dutch geriatric rehabilitation patients. We recommend to confirm the content validity of the PROMIS-PF-GR in other countries.Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Development of a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) short form for measuring physical function in geriatric rehabilitation patients

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Rose et al reported a RMSEA of about 0.08 for subsets of items from the original English PF v1.2 item bank [16]. The Dutch-Flemish PROMIS Physical Function v1.2 item bank showed a RMSEA of 0.122 [19] and 0.045 [20] in previous studies, respectively. For the Spanish population in the US, a RMSEA of 0.052 was found for the PROMIS Physical Function v1.2 item bank [53].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…The first version of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS Physical Function item bank (v1.2) contained 121 items [15][16][17]. This item bank has been validated in Dutch patients with chronic pain, patients undergoing physiotherapy, and patients with rheumatoid arthritis [18][19][20]. The PROMIS Group continued to improve the item bank, and a separate item bank for upper extremity injuries was developed, containing 46 items; the PROMIS V R Physical Function -Upper Extremity (UE) v2.0 item bank [21,22].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Structural validity and construct validity of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS^® physical function-upper extremity version 2.0 item bank in Dutch patients with upper extremity injuries

Bruggen

Lameijer

Terwee

2019

Disability and Rehabilitation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Aim of this study was to validate the Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function-Upper Extremity version 2.0 item bank in patients with upper extremity injuries. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional study. Structural validity was assessed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis examining unidimensionality. In addition, a bi-factor model was fitted. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was examined by assessing correlations with legacy instruments Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand, Patient Reported Wrist Evaluation and Michigan Hand Questionnaire subscale Activities in Daily Life. Results: A total of 303 patients (144 female) with mean age of 50 years (standard deviation 18) were included. Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed Comparative Fit Index of 0.94, a Tucker Lewis Index of 0.93, a Root Mean Square Error of Approximation of 0.12 and a Standardized Root Mean Residual of 0.09. Factor loadings were all above 0.70. Bifactor analysis showed an omega-H of 0.79 and Explained Common Variance of 0.67. The correlations with the legacy instruments were as expected or higher than expected. Conclusion: The Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function-Upper Extremity version 2.0 item bank measures a unidimensional trait and sufficient construct validity was found. ä IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Completing Patient Reported Outcomes is time-consuming for patients and interpretability of outcomes is sometimes unclear due to some variation in psychometric properties. Computerized Adaptive Testing reduces the burden for patients by using an algorithm which decreases the amount of questions that need to be answered to 4 to 7 items. The Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function-Upper Extremity version 2.0 item bank measures a unidimensional trait and has sufficient structural validity, internal consistency and construct validity. After calibration of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function-Upper Extremity version 2.0, the item bank is operable to use with Computerized Adaptive Testing.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the assessment of the cross‐cultural validity of the measures may also have been conducted in populations other than RA and would not have been captured by our literature search. For example, the cross‐cultural validity of the PROMIS physical function bank has been examined in >1,000 Dutch patients with chronic pain, and 4 items were flagged for DIF, which negligibly impacted overall scores (34). In contrast, a Spanish translation of the PROMIS physical function item bank was tested in the US general population, revealing that 50 of the 114 items were flagged for important DIF, indicating that English‐ and Spanish‐speaking individuals with the same underlying level of physical function responded differently to these questions (35).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Review and Appraisal of the Cross‐Cultural Validity of Functional Status Assessment Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Kulhawy-Wibe

Zell

Michaud

et al. 2020

Arthritis Care & Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. We conducted a systematic review and appraisal of the cross-cultural adaptation and cross-cultural validity of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and its derivatives, and of the more recent Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) functional status assessment measures (FSAMs) in rheumatoid arthritis.Methods. Four electronic medical databases were searched from inception until April 4, 2018 according to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) group search strategy. Included studies were evaluated using the COSMIN tool for cross-cultural validity and were scored as excellent, good, fair, or poor.Results. Of 58 articles identified by our search strategy and 3 by manual search, 39 were included: 29 described the translation, cultural adaptation, or cross-cultural validity of the HAQ disability index, 8 other HAQ derivatives, and 2 PROMIS measures, representing 22 languages. Of the 39 articles reviewed, 3 examined the cross-cultural validity of translated versions. These studies were rated as follows: 2 as excellent, 3 good, 13 fair, and 21 poor. Two studies examining cross-cultural validity noted differential item functioning (DIF) between Dutch and US populations for the HAQ-II and PROMIS measures, and a third study found DIF between Turkish and UK populations on the HAQ, indicating cultural differences in questionnaire response.Conclusion. This review highlights a paucity of data on the cross-cultural validity of FSAMs and the mostly pooror fair-quality methods by which they were translated and adapted, which needs to be considered when using these measures for multinational clinical trials and for day-to-day use in clinical practice.

show abstract

The Dutch–Flemish PROMIS Physical Function item bank exhibited strong psychometric properties in patients with chronic pain

Abstract: The Dutch-Flemish PROMIS Physical Function item bank exhibited good psychometric properties. Development of a computer adaptive test based on the large bank is warranted.

Cited by 31 publications

References 52 publications

Development of a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) short form for measuring physical function in geriatric rehabilitation patients

Development of a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) short form for measuring physical function in geriatric rehabilitation patients

Structural validity and construct validity of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS^® physical function-upper extremity version 2.0 item bank in Dutch patients with upper extremity injuries

Systematic Review and Appraisal of the Cross‐Cultural Validity of Functional Status Assessment Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

The Dutch–Flemish PROMIS Physical Function item bank exhibited strong psychometric properties in patients with chronic pain

Abstract: The Dutch-Flemish PROMIS Physical Function item bank exhibited good psychometric properties. Development of a computer adaptive test based on the large bank is warranted.

Cited by 31 publications

References 52 publications

Development of a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) short form for measuring physical function in geriatric rehabilitation patients

Development of a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) short form for measuring physical function in geriatric rehabilitation patients

Structural validity and construct validity of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS® physical function-upper extremity version 2.0 item bank in Dutch patients with upper extremity injuries

Systematic Review and Appraisal of the Cross‐Cultural Validity of Functional Status Assessment Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Structural validity and construct validity of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS^® physical function-upper extremity version 2.0 item bank in Dutch patients with upper extremity injuries