2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2011.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamic adjustments of stock prices to inflation disturbances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model is similar to those of Sargent (2001, 2005), Primiceri (2005), Gali and Gambetti, 2009, and Keating and Valcarcel (2011, 2012. Consider the following VAR process: 4 In addition, a traditional structural vector autoregression (SVAR) approach that assumes constant autoregressive coefficients and homoskedastic structural shocks based on a constant covariance matrix of the reduced-form VAR would be unsuitable to either distinguish between the good luck and good policy explanations or capture exchange rate dynamics that may be characterized by substantial time variation.…”
Section: The Var Model With Stochastic Volatilitysupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model is similar to those of Sargent (2001, 2005), Primiceri (2005), Gali and Gambetti, 2009, and Keating and Valcarcel (2011, 2012. Consider the following VAR process: 4 In addition, a traditional structural vector autoregression (SVAR) approach that assumes constant autoregressive coefficients and homoskedastic structural shocks based on a constant covariance matrix of the reduced-form VAR would be unsuitable to either distinguish between the good luck and good policy explanations or capture exchange rate dynamics that may be characterized by substantial time variation.…”
Section: The Var Model With Stochastic Volatilitysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Rather, they suggest that supply shocks may explain the increase in output volatility that resulted from the climate of uncertainty that characterized those two events. For example, Valcarcel (2012) shows similar increases in output growth volatility during the US Great Recession and its aftermath as largely explained by supply shocks. He shows this to occur at a time when the US inflation rate remained low, yet inflation volatility reached levels not seen since the Great US Inflation period.…”
Section: The Time-varying Volatilities Of Real Exchange Rates and Relmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The Great Recession period of 2008-2009 shows increasing volatilities in services and, especially, nondurable consumption-which, combined, comprise a substantial portion of gross domestic product (GDP). This increase in volatility in the largest component of GDP is consistent with the post-2007 increase in the uncertainty of economic activity that Valcarcel (2012) find. 26 Figure 6 shows that both services (figure 6a) and nondurable consumption spending (figure 6b) increase following an exogenous shock in government consumption.…”
Section: Empirical Application Ii: Var Estimationssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Whilst this literature offers comprehensive insights regarding the spillover effects between stock markets and the real economy, typical assumptions of theoretical models have led to dramatically different conclusions on various economic relationships (Hacker et al, 2014) and findings suggest that the actual connections between stock prices and macroeconomic variables could be fluid (Valcarcel, 2012). In addition, insights are at times contradictory due to the use of different proxies to model a given variable, and outcomes which may have been period-specific or country-specific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%