2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ecological and Conservation Status of The Guadalquivir River Basin (s Spain) Through The Application Of A Fish-based Multimetric Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A combination of habitat alteration (river fragmentation, pollution and channel modifications) and overfishing have led to this decline (Fernández‐Pasquier, 1999; Mateus et al, 2012). The ecological status of the basin in the current period makes the recovery of any of these species virtually impossible (Ramos‐Merchante & Prenda, 2018). At present, about 9,193 hm 3 of river flow is retained in 29 large reservoirs (>100 hm 3 ) and more than 140 smaller ones (<100 hm 3 ) (Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadalquivir, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A combination of habitat alteration (river fragmentation, pollution and channel modifications) and overfishing have led to this decline (Fernández‐Pasquier, 1999; Mateus et al, 2012). The ecological status of the basin in the current period makes the recovery of any of these species virtually impossible (Ramos‐Merchante & Prenda, 2018). At present, about 9,193 hm 3 of river flow is retained in 29 large reservoirs (>100 hm 3 ) and more than 140 smaller ones (<100 hm 3 ) (Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadalquivir, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biotic integrity, originally considered an elusive legislative concept by its main promoters (Karr et al, 1986), refers to the biological condition displayed by aquatic ecosystems in which ‘composition, structure, and function have not been adversely affected by human activities’ (Karr et al, 1986; Moore, Covington & Fulé, 1999). The most common assessment of biotic integrity is conducted through the well‐known and widely used multimetric Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) (Simon & Lyons, 1995; Aparicio et al, 2011; Hermoso & Clavero, 2013; Ramos‐Merchante & Prenda, 2018). One of the main contributions of this approach relies upon the relative condition of the ecosystem being evaluated with respect to a theoretical ‘pristine’ status, or ‘reference condition’ (RCs), free from human disturbance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The number of sites categorized under the fair (C; 20-26) was 73, which constituted 48.99% of the total study sites in whole Geum River watershed. Nevertheless, 52 sites obtained the poor (P) grade with mmIBI 08 model score range(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)) and constituted 34.89%. In total, 83.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%