2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2015.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of a thiol-containing organic molecule on molybdenum adsorption onto pyrite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the potential mechanisms responsible for Mo burial under sulfidic conditions, the Fe pathway has been favored mostly because of the experimental work done with Fe (Bostick et al., ; Freund et al., ; Helz et al., , ) that identified the reactions involved when Mo co‐precipitates with Fe sulfide and from observations that dissolved Mo concentrations in euxinic lake settings become constant below depths where sulfidic waters become saturated with iron monosulfide (Helz et al., ). However, Mo also precipitates with dead/lysed cells and with Fe‐contaminated humic acids in sulfidic solution (Helz et al., ), and the constant, nonzero dissolved Mo profile may also arise from the presence of Mo on non‐sinking organic material (e.g., colloidal, and small particulate organic matter, e.g., <0.2 μm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the potential mechanisms responsible for Mo burial under sulfidic conditions, the Fe pathway has been favored mostly because of the experimental work done with Fe (Bostick et al., ; Freund et al., ; Helz et al., , ) that identified the reactions involved when Mo co‐precipitates with Fe sulfide and from observations that dissolved Mo concentrations in euxinic lake settings become constant below depths where sulfidic waters become saturated with iron monosulfide (Helz et al., ). However, Mo also precipitates with dead/lysed cells and with Fe‐contaminated humic acids in sulfidic solution (Helz et al., ), and the constant, nonzero dissolved Mo profile may also arise from the presence of Mo on non‐sinking organic material (e.g., colloidal, and small particulate organic matter, e.g., <0.2 μm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Fe pathway, thiomolybdates can be reduced in the presence of zero‐valent sulfur to create Mo‐polysulfide species (Vorlicek, Kahn, Kasuya, & Helz, ) that are, for example, adsorbed or co‐precipitated with FeS 2 , FeS (Bostick et al., ; Freund et al., ; Helz, Vorlicek, & Kahn, ; Xu, Christodoulatos, & Braida, ), and clay minerals (i.e., illite and Fe‐contaminated kaolinite and montmorillonite) (Bertine, ; Helz et al., ; Vorlicek & Helz, ). Some of these minerals may even be imbedded in an organic matrix in a coupled Fe‐organic matter pathway (Dahl, Chappaz et al., ; Freund et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doushantuo Formation samples imply that Mo species structurally similar to intermediate thiomolybdates can undergo long-term burial and preservation, potentially in association with Fe phases as suggested by sample HN12 (Table 6) and by previous workers (Helz et al, 1996;Helz et al, 2004). Importantly, our model does not preclude other mechanisms of Mo fixation in highly sulfidic environments, where MoS 4 2formation is favored and adsorption to Fe-S mineral phases (e.g., pyrite) may occur (Bostick et al, 2003;Chappaz et al, 2014;Freund et al, 2016;Helz et al, 2011). Additionally, thiolation of organic matter at low ([H 2 S (aq) ]) or in the presence of polysulfides, followed by complexation to Mo, could provide another pathway by which Mo is sequestered in sediments during early diagenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Additionally, thiolation of organic matter at low ([H 2 S (aq) ]) or in the presence of polysulfides, followed by complexation to Mo, could provide another pathway by which Mo is sequestered in sediments during early diagenesis. Abiotic thiol formation has been shown to occur in reducing sediments Mopper, 1987, 1989), and MoS 4 2is capable of simultaneously binding to pyrite and thiols (Freund et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, only the adsorption of molybdates on goethite and gibbsite has been extensively studied [13]. However, in recent years, new, functionalized materials such as magnetic macroporous cross-linked copolymers of glycidyl methacrylate [14] or thiol-containing organic molecule of pyrite [15] have become increasingly popular in the immobilization of molybdates from aqueous solutions. In addition, an evaluation of the adsorption of mono- and polytungstates onto selected soil minerals (gibbsite, birnessite, kaolinite, illite, and montmorillonite) has been described by Sen Tuna [4] and Iwai and Hashimoto [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%