1976
DOI: 10.1016/0032-5910(76)80009-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of ball size on mill performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 regarding the production of M 2 being favoured by small balls complements previous work such as Austin et al [16]; Napier-Munn et al [17]; and Chimwani et al [13]. This again demonstrates how mill capacity is dependent on the media surface.…”
Section: Effects Of Ball Size Distribution On the Production Of The Fsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…5 regarding the production of M 2 being favoured by small balls complements previous work such as Austin et al [16]; Napier-Munn et al [17]; and Chimwani et al [13]. This again demonstrates how mill capacity is dependent on the media surface.…”
Section: Effects Of Ball Size Distribution On the Production Of The Fsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Previous research has shown that a faster production of fine particles is achieved by using smaller balls for smaller particles feed sizes (Austin et al, 1976;Napier-Munn et al, 1996;Chimwani et al, 2012). Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Ball Size On Mill Productionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is also a tendency for this optimum feed size to increase with ball diameter. Austin 7 and Zhao et alU used the following equation to show the change in the feed size of…”
Section: Sample Used and Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%