2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of decoupling on marginal agricultural systems: Implications for farm incomes, land use and upland ecology

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that the abolition of direct payments would be the hardest for regions with less favourable conditions for agriculture, the least affected would be the relatively competitive sectors and industries with a highly diversified agro-tourist potential, good marketing and sales structure. Acs et al (2010) point to a real risk of land abandonment in mountain areas and reducing the numbers of cattle. Offermann et al (2009) examine the status of organic farms.…”
Section: Methodology and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that the abolition of direct payments would be the hardest for regions with less favourable conditions for agriculture, the least affected would be the relatively competitive sectors and industries with a highly diversified agro-tourist potential, good marketing and sales structure. Acs et al (2010) point to a real risk of land abandonment in mountain areas and reducing the numbers of cattle. Offermann et al (2009) examine the status of organic farms.…”
Section: Methodology and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to other recent studies (Acs et al, 2010;Oñate et al, 2007), the decoupling of the CAP subsidies (separated aid from production) might encourage a shift from irrigated to non-irrigated agriculture. Fig.…”
Section: Bau Scenario: Following Current Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following indicators were included into multi-criteria analysis: technological (yield, share of sold production) (Balana et al, 2011;Uthes et al, 2011;Sauer et al, 2012;Dzikowski, 2013), environmental (expenses for plant protection) (Kriščiukaitienė et al, 2013); economic (production cost, price) (Blanco Fonseca, 2007;Acs et al, 2010;Udagawa et al, 2014); and social (labour input) (Blanco Fonseca, 2007).…”
Section: Assessment Of Technological Economic and Social Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%