2022
DOI: 10.17654/0972361722017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Incorporating Memory and Stochastic Volatility Into Geometric Brownian Motion in Forecasting the Performance of Tadawul All Share Index (Tasi)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the empirical results of this study agree with earlier empirical works such as Abbas & Alhagyan (2022;), Mansour & Alhagyan (2022, Alhagyan & Yassen (2023), Alhagyan (2022), Willinger et al (1999), Painter (1998), Rejichi & Aloui (2012) and Alhagyan & Alduais (2020) to name just a few. Subsequently, we are strongly recommend investors and trader to invest in the Energy Sector in Saudi Arabia because of its predictability and stability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the empirical results of this study agree with earlier empirical works such as Abbas & Alhagyan (2022;), Mansour & Alhagyan (2022, Alhagyan & Yassen (2023), Alhagyan (2022), Willinger et al (1999), Painter (1998), Rejichi & Aloui (2012) and Alhagyan & Alduais (2020) to name just a few. Subsequently, we are strongly recommend investors and trader to invest in the Energy Sector in Saudi Arabia because of its predictability and stability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, one can observe that the values of MSE of SVGFBM, GFBM, and SVGBM are close together while GBM is relatively far. These outcomes run in the same direction as many experimental researches for instance Willinger et al (1999), Rejichi and Aloui (2012), Alhagyan (2022), Painter (1998), Alhagyan and Yassen (2023), Alhagyan and Alduais (2020), and Abbas and Alhagyan (2022;. Figure 3 illustrates the comparison between the actual close prices versus forecasted close prices.…”
Section: Forecasting and Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation