“…While several studies found that dendrochemical concentration changes were reliable indicators of environmental change through time (Baes and McLaughlin, 1984;Momoshima and Bondietti, 1990;Bondietti et al, 1990;Guyette and Cutter, 1994;Yanosky and Kappel, 1997;Orlandi et al, 2002;Punshon et al, 2003Punshon et al, , 2004Pearson et al, 2008), other studies found no correlation (Hagemeyer, 1993;Hagemeyer et al, 1992;DeWalle et al, 1999;Bindler et al, 2004). Studies that found no correlation with environmental changes either concluded that the method was not useful to date the target event or attributed the dendrochemical changes to differences in the nature of heartwood and sapwood (Brownridge, 1984), to element accumulation in the outermost rings (Poulson et al, 1995), to radial transport and water transport through multiple sapwood rings (Lukaszewski et al, 1988;Hagemeyer et al, 1994;Zayed et al, 1992), or to reliance on analytical approaches that homogenize the wood (Brabander et al, 1999). The apparent controversy illustrates the need to understand the influences on dendrochemistry when interpreting the data.…”