2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of leg length discrepancy upon load distribution in the static phase (standing)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the low correlation value between clinical outcomes and postoperative LLD could have originated from other factors than LLD that were not included in this study. Moreover, uneven load distribution during gait with LLD can affect the load distribution of polyethylene in TKA, 25,26 and a long-term follow-up would be needed. Third, preoperative LLD itself, which is not included in regression analysis of this study, also could be a factor that affects the clinical outcomes, although postoperative LLD was found as a significant factor with low correlations in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the low correlation value between clinical outcomes and postoperative LLD could have originated from other factors than LLD that were not included in this study. Moreover, uneven load distribution during gait with LLD can affect the load distribution of polyethylene in TKA, 25,26 and a long-term follow-up would be needed. Third, preoperative LLD itself, which is not included in regression analysis of this study, also could be a factor that affects the clinical outcomes, although postoperative LLD was found as a significant factor with low correlations in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] Some degree (less than 2 cm) of leg length discrepancy can be allowed in humans because of a compensatory mechanism that dynamically lengthens the shorter limb and shortens the longer limb,[18] probably to minimize the displacement of the body center of mass and consequently reduce body energy expenditure. [19] However, a leg length discrepancy–whether lengthening or shortening–should be avoided as much as possible, because previous studies demonstrated that leg lengthening, even by less than 1 cm, increases the chance of developing knee osteoarthritis in the longer limb,[20] and that correcting leg length discrepancy of only 5.6 mm relieved chronic low back pain, possibly by reducing lumbar spine lateral flexion and rotation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Persons with LLD will have different load distribution on the two legs due to a shift in the body's CoM [12,14]. The goal of compensating the length of the shorter leg is to ensure equal load distribution on both legs which can be achieved by human body balancing, that is, by moving the CoM to its expected position.…”
Section: Human Body Balancingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that structural LLD features a higher vertical ground reaction force on the shorter leg than on the longer [12,13]. The Authors of [14] showed that, by using a pedobarograph, the difference in load distribution on the left leg can be measured by simulating a longer or shorter right leg. If the right leg were simulated to be 3.5 cm longer, the load on the left leg would amount to 64% of the patient's mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%