1951
DOI: 10.1002/cne.900940310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of neuro‐ and adenohypophysectomy on retrograde degeneration in hypothalamic nuclei of the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple calculations based on the fact that the SO and PV nuclei contain about 14,000 and 4000 cells in the rat, respectively (Bodian & Maren, 1951;Bandaranayake, 1971), and that 48 % of the SO units and 58 % of the PV units accelerate before each milk ejection suggests that the release of oxytocin favours the SO nucleus by a factor of 3: 1. This conclusion is D. W. LINCOLN AND J.…”
Section: Background Activity Of So Units During Sucklingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple calculations based on the fact that the SO and PV nuclei contain about 14,000 and 4000 cells in the rat, respectively (Bodian & Maren, 1951;Bandaranayake, 1971), and that 48 % of the SO units and 58 % of the PV units accelerate before each milk ejection suggests that the release of oxytocin favours the SO nucleus by a factor of 3: 1. This conclusion is D. W. LINCOLN AND J.…”
Section: Background Activity Of So Units During Sucklingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supraoptic nucleus as discussed here refers only to the principal part of the SON described by Bodian and Maren [3]. The retrochiasmatic part of the SON is classi fied with the accessory neurosecretory nuclei (fig.…”
Section: The Sonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each nucleus is, in turn, made up of another two parts: the principal one (BANDARANAYAKE,1971;RHODES et al, 1981) consisting of more than 80% of the whole number of the neurons and corresponding to CAJAL's nucleus tangentialis (NAUTA and HAYMAKER, 1969); and the other part just under the principal one, being variously considered: by SZENTAGOTHAI et al (1962) as the accessory nucleus, as the nucleus tuberalis by BoDIAN and MAREN (1951), and as the diffuse supraoptic nucleus by NAUTA and HAYMAKER (1969). In the present paper, only the principal part of the SON will be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%