The effect of peripheral visual feedforward system in enhancing situation awareness and mitigating motion sickness in fully automated driving

Karjanto, Juffrizal; Yusof, Nidzamuddin Md.; Wang, Chao; Terken, Jacques; Delbressine, Frank; Rauterberg, Matthias

doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.046

Cited by 77 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The impact of peripheral visual information in alleviating motion sickness when engaging in nondriving tasks in fully automated driving (Karjanto et al, 2018) Driver response when experiencing a safety critical take-over request (Blommer et al, 2017;Merat et al, 2014b;Shen & Neyens, 2017;Vogelpohl et al, 2018;Zeeb et al, 2015); Necessary time for drivers to achieve situation awareness (Agrawal et al, 2017;Vlakveld et al, 2018); How situation awareness in transfer of control is affected by driver fatigue, stress, (Neubauer et al, 2012); by workload (de Winter et al, 2014); by mental task demands (Heikoop et al, 2018); by alert cue specificity (Forster et al, 2017;Wright et al, 2017); and by driver experience (Wright et al, 2016b); Resuming control from the automation (Bueno et al, 2016;Clark & Jing Feng 2017;Gold et al, 2015;Merat & Lee, 2012;Merat et al, 2014;Merat et al, 2014b;Naujoks et al, 2018;Navarro et al, 2016;Petermeijer et al, 2017;Payre et al, 2017;Radlmayr et al, 2014;Zeeb et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2018); Post-transition driving performance (Berthelon & Gineyt, 2014;Miller et al, 2015;Mok et al, 2015;Naujoks et al, 2015;Naujoks, Purucker, et al 2017;Radlmayr et al, 2018;Strand et al, 2014;…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Driving with and without automation on the motorway – an observational study

Várhelyi

Kaufmann

Johnsson

et al. 2020

Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

User-related assessment of a level 3 automated driving system, providing functions such as lane-and distance-keeping, stop & go driving, lane change and overtaking, was carried out on a motorway in Germany with the aim to assess user-related issues of automated driving, i.e., behavior when driving with automation on motorways, user experiences, reactions and acceptance. Twenty-one persons drove twice along the test route once with the system switched off and once with the system active. Driving data were logged and driving behavior was observed by two observers in the car and the drivers answered questionnaires. The results revealed that the drivers used the system as it was intended to be used and that the system affected driving positively in several ways, resulting in better speed adaptation, less speed variation, better distance keeping, better lane choice, better indicator usage and fewer dangerous lane changes. No differences with regard to subjective workload were shown. The system was perceived as being both useful and satisfactory. However, it was found that the system did not react to other drivers' intention to make a lane change, especially in situations where they were attempting to merge onto the motorway. Further development is needed to improve the system's ability to recognize other vehicles' intention to enter the vehicle's own lane. Also, the phenomenon of the driver "feeling guilty" because of the system's reckless behavior by not allowing other drivers to merge onto the motorway or hindering other cars behind due to lengthy overtaking should be investigated further.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Driving with and without automation on the motorway – an observational study

Várhelyi

Kaufmann

Johnsson

et al. 2020

Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This result may be a coincidence and should not be considered reliable. However, as the work of Karjanto et al [19] suggests, peripheral stimuli can help to keep motion sickness low. Therefore, future experiments on this concept should include measures for motion sickness to understand the effects on motion sickness better.…”

Section: Implications For Further Iterationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Increasing User Experience and Trust in Automated Vehicles via an Ambient Light Display

Löcken

Frison

Fahn

et al. 2020

22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction With Mobile Devices and Services

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…as with the peripheral motion cue examined in (McGill et al 2017))? Anticipatory motion cues For example displaying impending motion (Karjanto et al 2018) or tricking the MR passenger into performing anticipatory motion actions. When motion cues should be presented For example based on user preferences or motion thresholds in an attempt to minimize the visual disruption or distraction the cues might cause.…”

Section: Resolving This Challengementioning

confidence: 99%

Challenges in passenger use of mixed reality headsets in cars and other transportation

McGill

Williamson

et al. 2019

Virtual Reality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines key challenges in supporting passenger use of augmented and virtual reality headsets in transit. These headsets will allow passengers to break free from the restraints of physical displays placed in constrained environments such as cars, trains and planes. Moreover, they have the potential to allow passengers to make better use of their time by making travel more productive and enjoyable, supporting both privacy and immersion. However, there are significant barriers to headset usage by passengers in transit contexts. These barriers range from impediments that would entirely prevent safe usage and function (e.g. motion sickness) to those that might impair their adoption (e.g. social acceptability). We identify the key challenges that need to be overcome and discuss the necessary resolutions and research required to facilitate adoption and realize the potential advantages of using mixed reality headsets in transit.

show abstract

The effect of peripheral visual feedforward system in enhancing situation awareness and mitigating motion sickness in fully automated driving

Cited by 77 publications

References 38 publications

Driving with and without automation on the motorway – an observational study

Driving with and without automation on the motorway – an observational study

Increasing User Experience and Trust in Automated Vehicles via an Ambient Light Display

Challenges in passenger use of mixed reality headsets in cars and other transportation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About