2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of selected staining techniques on bull sperm morphometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the difference in measurement results can be due to the difference in the staining method applied that can alter the morphometry dimensions (Maree et al 2010). Staining applied in a particular species may not be applicable in other species (Banaszewska et al 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the difference in measurement results can be due to the difference in the staining method applied that can alter the morphometry dimensions (Maree et al 2010). Staining applied in a particular species may not be applicable in other species (Banaszewska et al 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Value equals to 1 indicates the perfect ellipse. The rugosity characterizes the amorphous cells, also being assigned values in scale from −1 to +1.This parameter can be positively correlated with head length, as well as being an indication of cell susceptibility to damage/rupture(Banaszewska, Andraszek, Czubaszek, & Biesiada-Drzazga, 2015;Leite, 2011;Sánchez, Bastir, & Roldan, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these steps can affect not only the repeatability of the experiments but also the reproducibility and the comparison of results among laboratories, which are necessary for the practical use of sperm morphometric analyses. These aspects have been studied by several authors,6465666768697071 and they have not yet been completely resolved.…”
Section: Assessment Of Sperm Morphometry I – Technological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of staining protocol is the issue on which most authors have conducted their studies63656668707172737980 since it influences background noise, sperm contrast, and the identification of different areas within the cell. To prevent these problems during morphometric sperm analysis, fluorescence-based methods in combination with a CASA-Morph system have been developed for a more precise measurement of the nucleus, acrosome, and sperm head, yielding promising results 6481.…”
Section: Assessment Of Sperm Morphometry I – Technological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%