1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(81)80101-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of temperature on the bactericidal efficiency of sodium hypochlorite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[11] Raphael, et al tested 5.25% sodium hypochlorite on Streptococcus faecalis, S. aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 21°C and 37°C and found that increasing the temperature made no difference on antimicrobial efficacy and may even have decreased it. [12] Buttler and Crawford, using Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhosa, studied 0.58%, 2.7%, and 5.20% sodium hypochlorite for its ability to detoxify endotoxin. All 3 concentrations were equally effective; however, large amounts of E. coli endotoxin could not be detoxified by 1 ml of 0.58% or 2.7% sodium hypochlorite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] Raphael, et al tested 5.25% sodium hypochlorite on Streptococcus faecalis, S. aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 21°C and 37°C and found that increasing the temperature made no difference on antimicrobial efficacy and may even have decreased it. [12] Buttler and Crawford, using Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhosa, studied 0.58%, 2.7%, and 5.20% sodium hypochlorite for its ability to detoxify endotoxin. All 3 concentrations were equally effective; however, large amounts of E. coli endotoxin could not be detoxified by 1 ml of 0.58% or 2.7% sodium hypochlorite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1987). The precise concentration selected is based on a balance (Harrison 1984) of the perceived efficacy in bacterial killing (Bloomfield & Miles 1979, Harrison & Hand 1981, Raphael et al . 1981, Byström & Sundqvist 1983, Byström & Sundqvist 1985), tissue dissolution (Hand et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A concentração de tais soluções é muito variada, sendo empregada na prática clínica entre 0.5 e 5.25%, embora existam relatos de seu uso em até em 10% (NAKAMURA et al, 1985). Inúmeros fatores devem ser considerados para a escolha da concentração mais adequada de tal solução, dentre eles: poder antibacteriano (ANTONIAZZI, 1973;AUN;PAIVA, 1982;BERBER et al, 2006;BUTTLER;CRAWFORD, 1982;SUNDQVIST, 1983;SUNDQVIST, 1985;FERRARI;CAI;PAIVA;ANTONIAZZI, 1973;RAPHAEL et al 1981;SENIA et al, 1975;DEBELIAN, 1989;SIRTES et al, 2005;STEWART, 1955;STEWART;COBE;RAPPAPORT, 1961;ZEHNDER et al, 2002), dissolução tecidual (ABOU-RASS;OGLESBLY, 1981;CHRISTENSEN;McNEAL;ELEAZER, 2008;GROSSMAN;MEIMAN, 1941;MARSHALL;ROSEN, 1971;SIRTES et al, 2005;SPANÓ et al, 2001;ZEHNDER et al, 2002), toxicidade tecidual (BOMBANA et al, 1974;LAURETTI et al, 1975;OLIVEIRA, 2008;REYNOLDS, 1989;DEBELIAN, 1989) e efeitos sobre a dentina (GRIGORATOS et al, 2001;…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Em relação à potencialização dos efeitos antimicrobianos do hipoclorito de sódio, alguns autores avaliaram o aumento da temperatura dessas soluções, encontrando resultados contraditórios. Raphael et al (1981) , 1992;BUTTLER;CRAWFORD, 1982;SUNDQVIST, 1983;SUNDQVIST, 1985;FERRARI;CAI;DEBELIAN, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation