2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of template selection on diffusion tensor voxel-based analysis results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
51
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To minimize registration errors, we used a population atlasebased approach and sophisticated well-validated nonlinear registration methods (Avants et al, 2008) and assessed registration accuracy at each stage of the processing and analysis pipeline. However, as with all studies of this type, we cannot rule out the contribution of subtle registration, interpolation, and partial volume effects to our findings (Van Hecke et al, 2011;Vos et al, 2011). In this context, although we did not detect voxelwise correlations between age and WM volume, it is still possible that the associations we have detected reflect age-related macrostructural changes rather than changes in specific microstructural elements such as myelin content.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…To minimize registration errors, we used a population atlasebased approach and sophisticated well-validated nonlinear registration methods (Avants et al, 2008) and assessed registration accuracy at each stage of the processing and analysis pipeline. However, as with all studies of this type, we cannot rule out the contribution of subtle registration, interpolation, and partial volume effects to our findings (Van Hecke et al, 2011;Vos et al, 2011). In this context, although we did not detect voxelwise correlations between age and WM volume, it is still possible that the associations we have detected reflect age-related macrostructural changes rather than changes in specific microstructural elements such as myelin content.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…In relation to template type, the observed differences are of interest, as previous findings have shown that study-specific templates provide greater sensitivity and accuracy than standard templates [39]. The results in this study show a slight improvement in reliability when using a study-specific template; however, in three methods and two regions, age modeling slightly improved with the standard template.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…There has also been extensive testing of skeleton-based analysis to understand its strengths and limitations [28] [26] [37] as well as comparing to voxel-based analysis and region-based analysis [20] [21]. Previous work has also evaluated the choice of template type, showing the advantages of study-specific and high-quality templates [38] [39] [40] [41]. This paper builds on these prior findings by expanding the range of methods simultaneously compared in evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key step of both voxel- and fixel-based analysis is the spatial normalisation of all subject images, ideally to a representative average study-specific template (Mohammadi et al, 2012, Van Hecke et al, 2011). This involves deriving a non-linear warp for each subject that maps each point in the template image to a corresponding point in the subject image.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%