2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of visible light on the dissolution of natural chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) in sulphuric acid solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative explanation has been advanced in several papers (Crundwell et al, 2015 and references therein) in terms of which the passivation is due to limitations imposed by the semiconducting properties of chalcopyrite and not to the formation of the metal-deficient layer described above. This theory has recently been subject to criticism in that a) apparent photoeffects at chalcopyrite (Crundwell et al, 2015) have been shown to be thermal in origin (Nicol, 2016a) and b) capacitance measurements…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative explanation has been advanced in several papers (Crundwell et al, 2015 and references therein) in terms of which the passivation is due to limitations imposed by the semiconducting properties of chalcopyrite and not to the formation of the metal-deficient layer described above. This theory has recently been subject to criticism in that a) apparent photoeffects at chalcopyrite (Crundwell et al, 2015) have been shown to be thermal in origin (Nicol, 2016a) and b) capacitance measurements…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent paper (Crundwell et al, 2015), it was shown that photocurrents could be observed at a chalcopyrite electrode when exposed to radiation from a 2 watt LED source at various anodic potentials in dilute sulfuric acid solutions. These results together with apparent correspondence between carrier concentrations determined by…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, according to density functional theory calculations, S 4 2– was formed on the chalcopyrite surface. , Holmes et al and Crundwell suggested that the S n 2– and Cu 1– x Fe 1– y S 2– z are essentially the same; the only difference is the focus on either the sulfur or metal removal. However, Crundwell et al , argued that the rate of chalcopyrite dissolution is not limited by passivation films or layers but is intrinsically slow due to the semiconducting properties of chalcopyrite. Furthermore, they identified the chalcopyrite anodic dissolution as a depletion region (from 0.3 to 0.6 V vs SCE) and inversion region (>0.7 V vs SCE) for ideal n-type semiconductor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%