1976
DOI: 10.1016/0370-1573(76)90027-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effective neutron—proton interaction in rare-earth nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
77
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
77
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We plan in the future to apply the method to two-quasiparticle wave functions, starting with the ground states of odd-odd nuclei. The energy splitting of the states with different K quantum numbers in strong deformed nuclei will provide a good test of the T -odd part of the interaction [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We plan in the future to apply the method to two-quasiparticle wave functions, starting with the ground states of odd-odd nuclei. The energy splitting of the states with different K quantum numbers in strong deformed nuclei will provide a good test of the T -odd part of the interaction [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two possible relative spin orientations, K p + K n and |K p − K n | give rise to two separate rotational bands having band-head angular momentum J = |K p ± K n |. According to the rule [6,7], the oriention with parallel intrinsic spins is the lower energy band. As documented in a review of the GM rule [7], there are only rare exceptions to the rule.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference is[22] the D1S is shown in comparison to the empirical ∆v np discussed in Refs. [7,13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The program ASYRPN described in [7] has been employed with deformation parameters ε 2 =0.20, and ε 4 =0.065. The central residual NN-interaction with short and long range components and spin polarization [8] At the present stage of our work, we believe that the presently adopted [6] structure interpretation of the 186 Re positive parity levels requires additional validation, both experimental and theoretical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%